Literature DB >> 18316597

Mouse models for xeroderma pigmentosum group A and group C show divergent cancer phenotypes.

Joost P M Melis1, Susan W P Wijnhoven, Rudolf B Beems, Marianne Roodbergen, Jolanda van den Berg, Hojin Moon, Errol Friedberg, Gijsbertus T J van der Horst, Jan H J Hoeijmakers, Jan Vijg, Harry van Steeg.   

Abstract

The accumulation of DNA damage is a slow but hazardous phenomenon that may lead to cell death, accelerated aging, and cancer. One of the most versatile defense mechanisms against the accumulation of DNA damage is nucleotide excision repair, in which, among others, the Xeroderma pigmentosum group C (XPC) and group A (XPA) proteins are involved. To elucidate differences in the functions of these two proteins, comprehensive survival studies with Xpa(-/-), Xpc(-/-) and wild-type control female mice in a pure C57BL/6J background were done. The median survival of Xpc(-/-) mice showed a significant decrease, whereas the median survival of Xpa(-/-) mice did not. Strikingly, Xpa(-/-) and Xpc(-/-) mice also showed a phenotypical difference in terms of tumor spectrum. Xpc(-/-) mice displayed a significant increase in lung tumors and a trend toward increased liver tumors compared with Xpa-deficient or wild-type mice. Xpa(-/-) mice showed a significant elevation in liver tumors. Additionally, Xpc-deficient mice exhibited a strong increase in mutant frequency in lung compared with Xpa(-/-) mice, whereas in both models mutant frequency is increased in liver. Our in vitro data displayed an elevated sensitivity to oxygen in Xpc(-/-) in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) when compared with Xpa(-/-) and wild-type fibroblasts. We believe that XPC plays a role in the removal of oxidative DNA damage and that, therefore, Xpc(-/-) mice display a significant increase in lung tumors and a significant elevation in mutant frequency in lung, and Xpc-deficient MEFs show greater sensitivity to oxygen when compared with Xpa(-/-) and wild-type mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316597     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  34 in total

1.  Dissection of the molecular defects caused by pathogenic mutations in the DNA repair factor XPC.

Authors:  Bruno M Bernardes de Jesus; Magnar Bjørås; Frédéric Coin; Jean Marc Egly
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  Disorders of nucleotide excision repair: the genetic and molecular basis of heterogeneity.

Authors:  James E Cleaver; Ernest T Lam; Ingrid Revet
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Oxidative DNA damage and nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  Joost P M Melis; Harry van Steeg; Mirjam Luijten
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 4.  Oxidative and energy metabolism as potential clues for clinical heterogeneity in nucleotide excision repair disorders.

Authors:  Mohsen Hosseini; Khaled Ezzedine; Alain Taieb; Hamid R Rezvani
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 5.  Deconstructing networks of p53-mediated tumor suppression in vivo.

Authors:  Alyssa M Kaiser; Laura D Attardi
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 15.828

6.  XPC silencing in normal human keratinocytes triggers metabolic alterations that drive the formation of squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Rezvani; Arianna L Kim; Rodrigue Rossignol; Nsrein Ali; Meaghan Daly; Walid Mahfouf; Nadège Bellance; Alain Taïeb; Hubert de Verneuil; Frédéric Mazurier; David R Bickers
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  The role of XPC: implications in cancer and oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  Joost P M Melis; Mirjam Luijten; Leon H F Mullenders; Harry van Steeg
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  The Xpc gene markedly affects cell survival in mouse bone marrow.

Authors:  Joshua L Fischer; M A Suresh Kumar; Travis W Day; Tabitha M Hardy; Shari Hamilton; Cynthia Besch-Williford; Ahmad R Safa; Karen E Pollok; Martin L Smith
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.000

9.  Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, smoking, and bladder cancer risk: findings from the international consortium of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Mariana C Stern; Jie Lin; Jonine D Figueroa; Karl T Kelsey; Anne E Kiltie; Jian-Min Yuan; Giuseppe Matullo; Tony Fletcher; Simone Benhamou; Jack A Taylor; Donatella Placidi; Zuo-Feng Zhang; Gunnar Steineck; Nathaniel Rothman; Manolis Kogevinas; Debra Silverman; Nuria Malats; Stephen Chanock; Xifeng Wu; Margaret R Karagas; Angeline S Andrew; Heather H Nelson; D Timothy Bishop; Sei Chung Sak; Ananya Choudhury; Jennifer H Barrett; Faye Elliot; Román Corral; Amit D Joshi; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Victoria K Cortessis; Yong-Bing Xiang; Yu-Tang Gao; Paolo Vineis; Carlotta Sacerdote; Simonetta Guarrera; Silvia Polidoro; Alessandra Allione; Eugen Gurzau; Kvetoslava Koppova; Rajiv Kumar; Peter Rudnai; Stefano Porru; Angela Carta; Marcello Campagna; Cecilia Arici; Sung Shim Lani Park; Montserrat Garcia-Closas
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Age-related motor neuron degeneration in DNA repair-deficient Ercc1 mice.

Authors:  Monique C de Waard; Ingrid van der Pluijm; Nils Zuiderveen Borgesius; Laura H Comley; Elize D Haasdijk; Yvonne Rijksen; Yanto Ridwan; Gerben Zondag; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Ype Elgersma; Thomas H Gillingwater; Dick Jaarsma
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 17.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.