Literature DB >> 18316314

A direct comparison of the taste of electrical and chemical stimuli.

David A Stevens1, Diane Baker, Elizabeth Cutroni, Alexander Frey, David Pugh, Harry T Lawless.   

Abstract

Three multidimensional scaling studies were conducted to compare the taste qualities evoked from electrical and chemical stimulation, including ferrous sulfate as a typical "metallic" taste stimulus. Bipolar, anodal, and cathodal stimulation were delivered by 1.5- or 3-V batteries applied to the tongue. Solutions of chemical stimuli including prototypical tastes and binary mixtures were evaporated on small metal disks to provide tactile impressions similar to those of the battery stimuli and avoid any potential response biases induced by the subjects' knowledge of the form of the stimulus. Multidimensional unfolding was performed to place stimuli and verbal descriptors in common perceptual spaces. Bipolar, anodal, and cathodal stimuli were tested in separate experiments but generated very similar perceptual spaces and were differentiated from the chemical stimuli. Electrical stimuli were associated with descriptors, such as metallic, copper penny, and iron nail, regardless of the polarity of stimulation. Taste qualities evoked by electric stimuli may not be fully described by commonly used taste stimuli or their binary mixtures and appear most adequately described by a unique metallic taste.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316314     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjn002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  5 in total

Review 1.  Metallic taste prevalence in patients treated for cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Buiret; Thierry Thomas-Danguin; Gilles Feron
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Salt taste inhibition by cathodal current.

Authors:  Thomas P Hettinger; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  The perception of materials through oral sensation.

Authors:  Philip D Howes; Supinya Wongsriruksa; Zoe Laughlin; Harry J Witchel; Mark Miodownik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Galvanic Tongue Stimulation Inhibits Five Basic Tastes Induced by Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions.

Authors:  Kazuma Aoyama; Kenta Sakurai; Satoru Sakurai; Makoto Mizukami; Taro Maeda; Hideyuki Ando
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-05

5.  Effect of cigarette smoke on gustatory sensitivity, evaluation of the deficit and of the recovery time-course after smoking cessation.

Authors:  Fabrice Chéruel; Marta Jarlier; Hélène Sancho-Garnier
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.