Mary Steinhardt1, Christyn Dolbier. 1. Kinesiology and Health Education Department, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78710, USA. msteinhardt@mail.utexas.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this pilot study, the authors examined the effectiveness of a 4-week resilience intervention to enhance resilience, coping strategies, and protective factors, as well as decrease symptomatology during a period of increased academic stress. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: College students were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 30) and wait-list control (n = 27) groups. The experimental group received a psychoeducational intervention in 4 two-hour weekly sessions. Measures of resilience, coping strategies, protective factors, and symptomatology were administered pre- and postintervention to both groups. RESULTS: Analyses indicated that the experimental group had significantly higher resilience scores, more effective coping strategies (i.e., higher problem solving, lower avoidant), higher scores on protective factors (i.e., positive affect, self-esteem, self-leadership), and lower scores on symptomatology (i.e., depressive symptoms, negative affect, perceived stress) postintervention than did the wait-list control group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that this resilience program may be useful as a stress-management and stress-prevention intervention for college students.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: In this pilot study, the authors examined the effectiveness of a 4-week resilience intervention to enhance resilience, coping strategies, and protective factors, as well as decrease symptomatology during a period of increased academic stress. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: College students were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 30) and wait-list control (n = 27) groups. The experimental group received a psychoeducational intervention in 4 two-hour weekly sessions. Measures of resilience, coping strategies, protective factors, and symptomatology were administered pre- and postintervention to both groups. RESULTS: Analyses indicated that the experimental group had significantly higher resilience scores, more effective coping strategies (i.e., higher problem solving, lower avoidant), higher scores on protective factors (i.e., positive affect, self-esteem, self-leadership), and lower scores on symptomatology (i.e., depressive symptoms, negative affect, perceived stress) postintervention than did the wait-list control group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that this resilience program may be useful as a stress-management and stress-prevention intervention for college students.
Authors: Desiree R Azizoddin; Geraldine Zamora-Racaza; Sarah R Ormseth; Lekeisha A Sumner; Chelsie Cost; Julia R Ayeroff; Michael H Weisman; Perry M Nicassio Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2017-12
Authors: Luci A Martin; Joseph W Critelli; Joseph A Doster; Catherine Powers; Michael Purdum; Meagen R Doster; Paul L Lambert Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2013-03
Authors: Abby R Rosenberg; Joanne Wolfe; Miranda C Bradford; Michele L Shaffer; Joyce P Yi-Frazier; J Randall Curtis; Karen L Syrjala; K Scott Baker Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Isha W Metzger; Claire Blevins; Casey D Calhoun; Tiarney D Ritchwood; Amanda K Gilmore; Regan Stewart; Kaitlin E Bountress Journal: J Am Coll Health Date: 2017-07-14
Authors: Sannisha K Dale; Mardge H Cohen; Gwendolyn A Kelso; Ruth C Cruise; Kathleen M Weber; Cheryl Watson; Jane K Burke-Miller; Leslie R Brody Journal: Sex Roles Date: 2014-03-01