Literature DB >> 18315992

Inappropriate use of symptom-triggered therapy for alcohol withdrawal in the general hospital.

Kathleen A Hecksel1, J Michael Bostwick, Thomas M Jaeger, Stephen S Cha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if hospitalized medical and surgical patients were placed inappropriately on symptom-triggered therapy (STT) for alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) and if certain conditions were more likely to be associated with inappropriate STT use or adverse events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly selected 124 (25%) of the 495 Mayo Clinic inpatients who received STT according to the Revised Clinical Institute for Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA-Ar) protocol in 2003 and assessed them for STT appropriateness, defined as having both intact verbal communication and recent alcohol use. Adverse events, including delirium tremens, seizures, or death, were correlated with CIWA-Ar appropriateness.
RESULTS: Of the 124 randomly selected patients, only 60 (48%) met both inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 64 patients, 9 (14%) were drinkers but could not communicate, and 35 (55%) could communicate but had not been drinking. Twenty (31%) met neither criterion. Univariate analysis identified a significant association between inappropriate initiation and chronic heart failure, postoperative status (POS), liver disease (LD), nonmetastatic cancer, and chemical dependency consultation. On multivariate analysis, only LD (P equals .02) and POS (P equals .01) retained significance, with LD more and POS less likely to predict appropriateness. Seven of 11 patients who experienced adverse events had received STT according to the CIWA-Ar protocol (P equals .05). Univariate analysis identified a significant association between adverse events and a history of alcohol dependence or AWS. Multivariate analysis showed significance only for a history of alcohol dependence (P equals .049).
CONCLUSION: Fewer than half of the randomly selected patients met both of the inclusion criteria for the CIWA-Ar instrument, leading us to conclude that more stringent evaluation is needed. Particularly postoperatively, alternative explanations for putative AWS should be sought. Health care professionals should more aggressively seek information on recent alcohol use from medical records, family members, and patients themselves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18315992     DOI: 10.4065/83.3.274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  18 in total

1.  Current approaches to the recognition and treatment of alcohol withdrawal and delirium tremens: "old wine in new bottles" or "new wine in old bottles".

Authors:  Theodore A Stern; Anne F Gross; Thomas W Stern; Shamim H Nejad; Jose R Maldonado
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010

2.  Alcohol withdrawal prevention: a randomized evaluation of lorazepam and ethanol--a pilot study.

Authors:  Joyce E Fullwood; Zhila Mostaghimi; Christopher B Granger; Jeffrey B Washam; Wanda Bride; Yanfang Zhao; Bradi B Granger
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Symptom-Triggered Therapy for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jürgen L Holleck; Naseema Merchant; Craig G Gunderson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Inpatient alcohol withdrawal: time to prevent the preventable?

Authors:  Kendal Williams; Matthew Mitchell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Evaluation of an alcohol withdrawal protocol and a preprinted order set at a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Karen Ng; Karen Dahri; Ivy Chow; Michael Legal
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2011-11

Review 6.  Autonomic dysfunction in the neurological intensive care unit.

Authors:  Max J Hilz; Mao Liu; Sankanika Roy; Ruihao Wang
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.435

7.  Dexmedetomidine controls agitation and facilitates reliable, serial neurological examinations in a non-intubated patient with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Julin F Tang; Po-Liang Chen; Eric J Tang; Todd A May; Shirley I Stiver
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised might be an unreliable tool in the management of alcohol withdrawal.

Authors:  Erin Knight; Leslie Lappalainen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Alcohol withdrawal syndrome in critically ill patients: protocolized versus nonprotocolized management.

Authors:  Jeremiah J Duby; Andrew J Berry; Paricheh Ghayyem; Machelle D Wilson; Christine S Cocanour
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 10.  Default options in the ICU: widely used but insufficiently understood.

Authors:  Joanna Hart; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.687

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.