Literature DB >> 1831495

Cyclophosphamide plus cisplatin versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin chemotherapy of ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysis. The Ovarian Cancer Meta-Analysis Project.

.   

Abstract

Four randomized clinical trials comparing cyclophosphamide plus cisplatin (CP) versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP) individually failed to show a significant survival difference in the treatment of ovarian carcinoma. However, by pooling 1,194 patients from these trials in a meta-analysis, there is a statistically significant survival benefit for CAP (P = .02); in addition, there is a significant advantage for CAP in frequency of negative second-look laparotomy (CAP, 30%; CP, 23%; P = .01). Because the dose intensity of CAP was greater than CP in three of the trials, it remains unresolved to what extent the benefit of CAP is from greater dose intensity and to what extent it is from the doxorubicin itself. Either interpretation suggests directions for improving the chemotherapy of ovarian carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1831495     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.9.1668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  18 in total

1.  A unified procedure for meta-analytic evaluation of surrogate end points in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  James Y Dai; James P Hughes
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 2.  Current drug treatment guidelines for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  P C Lorigan; T Crosby; R E Coleman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Does adjuvant chemotherapy dose modification have an impact on the outcome of patients diagnosed with advanced stage ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Alexander B Olawaiye; James J Java; Thomas C Krivak; Michael Friedlander; David G Mutch; Gretchen Glaser; Melissa Geller; David M O'Malley; Robert M Wenham; Roger B Lee; Diane C Bodurka; Thomas J Herzog; Michael A Bookman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  Pursuit of optimum outcomes in ovarian cancer: methodological approaches to therapy.

Authors:  D D Gibbs; M E Gore
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  In vitro chemosensitivity testing and mechanisms of drug resistance.

Authors:  K Tewari; A Manetta
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for platinum-resistant or refractory Müllerian carcinoma (epithelial ovarian carcinoma, primary carcinoma of Fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma): A single-institutional experience.

Authors:  Takeshi Fukuda; Toshiyuki Sumi; Masatomo Teramae; Yusuke Nakano; Masanari Morishita; Hiroyuki Terada; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Yoshinari Matsumoto; Tomoyo Yasui; Osamu Ishiko
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Progress in gynecologic cancer research: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience.

Authors:  George A Omura
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 8.  Pharmaceutical management of ovarian cancer : current status.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Phase II study of pirarubicin combined with cisplatin in recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A du Bois; H G Meerpohl; H Madjar; D Spinner; P Dall; J Pfisterer; T Bauknecht
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/carboplatin combination in ovarian cancer, progressing on single-agent pegylated liposomal doxorubicin.

Authors:  Tal Grenader; Ora Rosengarten; Rut Isacson; Yevgeni Plotkin; Alberto Gabizon
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.