Literature DB >> 18314062

From cellular to high-throughput predictive assays in radiation oncology: challenges and opportunities.

Søren M Bentzen1.   

Abstract

Substantial research efforts into predictive radiation oncology have so far produced very little in terms of clinically applicable assays. This may change with the development of novel high-throughput assays that are of potential interest in a radiation oncology setting. However, it seems that much current research is opportunistic, driven by the available technologies rather than addressing pertinent clinical or biological questions. This review looks at the experience gained from the attempts to develop cellular radiobiology assays. The research process and, in particular, the need for rigorous validation of any promising assay in an independent dataset are stressed. Some common design problems are discussed using examples from radiation oncology. The statistical challenges and some of the key concepts in analyzing dense datasets from high-throughput assays are briefly reviewed. Single nucleotide polymorphisms, immunohistochemical markers, and DNA microarray gene signatures are used as examples of assays that show promise in radiation oncology applications. Some recent studies suggest a differential treatment response between tumor stem cells and other tumor cells. If this is a general pattern, then future predictive assays may have to be performed on stems cells rather than on unselected tumor cells. Advances in radiogenomics or radioproteomics will come from large collaborative research networks, collecting high-quality dosimetric and clinical outcome data and combining state-of-the-art laboratory techniques with appropriate biostatical methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18314062     DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  10 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints for normal-tissue effects of radiation therapy: the importance of dose-volume effects.

Authors:  Søren M Bentzen; Matthew Parliament; Joseph O Deasy; Adam Dicker; Walter J Curran; Jacqueline P Williams; Barry S Rosenstein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Accurate accumulation of dose for improved understanding of radiation effects in normal tissue.

Authors:  David A Jaffray; Patricia E Lindsay; Kristy K Brock; Joseph O Deasy; W A Tomé
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  [Virtual microscopy in systems pathology].

Authors:  N Grabe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 4.  Fluorescent imaging of cancerous tissues for targeted surgery.

Authors:  Lihong Bu; Baozhong Shen; Zhen Cheng
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  A prospective study comparing the predictions of doctors versus models for treatment outcome of lung cancer patients: a step toward individualized care and shared decision making.

Authors:  Cary Oberije; Georgi Nalbantov; Andre Dekker; Liesbeth Boersma; Jacques Borger; Bart Reymen; Angela van Baardwijk; Rinus Wanders; Dirk De Ruysscher; Ewout Steyerberg; Anne-Marie Dingemans; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) modeling of late rectal bleeding following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A Test of the QUANTEC-recommended NTCP model.

Authors:  Mitchell Liu; Vitali Moiseenko; Alexander Agranovich; Anand Karvat; Winkle Kwan; Ziad H Saleh; Aditya A Apte; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 7.  Radiation-Induced Chromosomal Aberrations and Immunotherapy: Micronuclei, Cytosolic DNA, and Interferon-Production Pathway.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Silvia C Formenti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals AK2 as potential biomarker for late normal tissue radiotoxicity.

Authors:  Jérôme Lacombe; Muriel Brengues; Alain Mangé; Céline Bourgier; Sophie Gourgou; André Pèlegrin; Mahmut Ozsahin; Jérôme Solassol; David Azria
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Bioinformatics methods for learning radiation-induced lung inflammation from heterogeneous retrospective and prospective data.

Authors:  Sarah J Spencer; Damian Almiron Bonnin; Joseph O Deasy; Jeffrey D Bradley; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2009-05-28

Review 10.  The role of imaging in radiation therapy planning: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Gisele C Pereira; Melanie Traughber; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.