Literature DB >> 18313320

Modified closure technique for reducing sternal dehiscence; a clinical and in vitro assessment.

Lindsay C H John1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although the incidence of sternal dehiscence is low its mortality can be high. An alternative technique is described (modified closure) which aims to redistribute the dehiscence force into the longer longitudinal axis rather than the shorter transverse axis, thereby maximising the closure strength. Four ethibond sutures, which interlock anteriorly, are used in addition to eight transverse sternal wires. The aim of the study was to assess the modified closure using both an in vitro and a clinical study.
METHODS: (a) In vitro study: A weight and traction pulley system applied a force of 0.1kN to pairs of silicone rubber hemisterna approximated to each other using alternative closure techniques. The dehiscence tendency (DT) was measured as the amount of separation under tension. Using 10 pairs of hemisterna for each closure technique the measured DT for the modified closure (MC) was compare with those for each of five alternative closures (two figure-of-eight and four transverse sutures (2C), 6 (6T), 8 (8T), 10 (10T) and 12 transverse sutures (12T)). (b) Clinical study: The incidence of sternal dehiscence for the first 4 years of a consultants' practice (using 8T) was compared with the second 4 years (using MC).
RESULTS: (a) Measured DT (mean+/-SEM), (MC: 149+/-14; 6T: 256+/-13; 8T: 223+/-9; 10T: 213+/-13; 12T: 203+/-8; 2C: 294+/-15). DT was significantly smaller for MC (p<0.003). (b) The incidence of dehiscence was significantly smaller in the second 4 years (MC) than in the first (8T): 0.2% (1/529) versus 1.6% (13/788); p=0.01
CONCLUSIONS: In vitro and clinical studies suggest that the modified closure technique can reduce the incidence of sternal dehiscence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18313320     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

Review 1.  Use of negative pressure wound therapy over clean, closed surgical incisions.

Authors:  James P Stannard; Allen Gabriel; Burkhard Lehner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The enhanced healing of a high-risk, clean, sutured surgical incision by prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy as delivered by Prevena™ Customizable™: cosmetic and therapeutic results.

Authors:  Alessandro Scalise; Caterina Tartaglione; Elisa Bolletta; Roberto Calamita; Giovanni Nicoletti; Marina Pierangeli; Luca Grassetti; Giovanni Di Benedetto
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Placement of trans-sternal wires according to an ellipsoid pressure vessel model of sternal forces.

Authors:  Aaron R Casha; Alex Manché; Marilyn Gauci; Marie-Therese Camilleri-Podesta; Pierre Schembri-Wismayer; Zdenka Sant; Ruben Gatt; Joseph N Grima
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-20

Review 4.  Improving wound healing and preventing surgical site complications of closed surgical incisions: a possible role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alessandro Scalise; Roberto Calamita; Caterina Tartaglione; Marina Pierangeli; Elisa Bolletta; Matteo Gioacchini; Rosaria Gesuita; Giovanni Di Benedetto
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Determining risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence: a literature review.

Authors:  Kylie Sandy-Hodgetts; Keryln Carville; Gavin D Leslie
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Upper Blepharoplasty and Lateral Wound Dehiscence.

Authors:  Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli; Mansooreh Jamshidian-Tehrani; Sahab Sharzad; Mostafa Soltan Sanjari
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.