Literature DB >> 18312884

Comparison of paper-patch, fat, and perichondrium myringoplasty in repair of small tympanic membrane perforations.

Engin Dursun1, Salim Dogru, Atila Gungor, Hakan Cincik, Ethem Poyrazoglu, Taner Ozdemir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of paper-patch, fat, and perichondrium myringoplasty in the treatment of chronic tympanic membrane perforations smaller than 3 mm. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This investigation included 45 patients with chronic tympanic membrane perforations smaller than 3 mm. The patients were equally divided into 3 main groups according to surgical procedures. Each group consisted of 3 subgroups, which had 1-mm, 2-mm, and 3-mm perforations. The patients underwent paper-patch, fat, or perichondrium myringoplasty via transcanal approach under local anesthesia. Healing of perforation, hearing improvement, and complications were investigated.
RESULTS: Closure rates of the perforations in the paper-patch, fat, and perichondrium myringoplasty groups were 66.7%, 86.7%, and 86.7%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in tympanic membrane closure rates between techniques with regard to size.
CONCLUSION: Three techniques were found to be feasible for tympanic membrane perforations smaller than 3 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18312884     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  16 in total

1.  In response to: Hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty vs. fat patch fat graft myringoplasty.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Biocompatibility evaluation of cigarette and carbon papers used in repair of traumatic tympanic membrane perforations: experimental study.

Authors:  Emine Elif Altuntaş; Zeynep Sümer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Predictors for outcome of paper patch myringoplasty in patients with chronic tympanic membrane perforations.

Authors:  Shi-Nae Park; Hyo-Min Kim; Kyung-Suk Jin; Jae-Hoan Maeng; Sang-Won Yeo; So-Young Park
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A study of closure of tympanic membrane perforations by chemical cauterisation.

Authors:  T Santhi; K V Rajan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-12-15

5.  Factors affecting the treatment outcomes of myringoplasty in patients with small tympanic membrane perforations.

Authors:  Shih-Lung Chen; Shih-Wei Yang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Reply to the letter to the editor concerning: 'Fat-plug myringoplasty of ear lobule vs abdominal donor sites'.

Authors:  Mustafa Acar; Demet Yazıcı; Turhan San; Nuray Bayar Muluk; Cemal Cingi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  A Comparative Study of Various Office Procedures for the Management of Small to Medium Size Tympanic Membrane Perforations.

Authors:  Ashish Mourya; Leena Jain; Shalini Jadia; Sadat Qureshi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-04-19

8.  A better design is needed for clinical studies of chronic tympanic membrane perforations using biological materials.

Authors:  Zheng-Cai Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  A new graft material for myringoplasty: bacterial cellulose.

Authors:  Sultan Biskin; Murat Damar; Sema Nur Oktem; Erdal Sakalli; Duygu Erdem; Onur Pakir
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Fat-plug myringoplasty of ear lobule vs abdominal donor sites.

Authors:  Mustafa Acar; Demet Yazıcı; Turhan San; Nuray Bayar Muluk; Cemal Cingi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.