Literature DB >> 18312048

National survey of adherence, efficacy, and side effects of methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Taiwan.

Susan Shur-Fen Gau1, Shin-Jaw Chen, Wen-Jiun Chou, Helen Cheng, Ching-Shu Tang, Hsueh-Ling Chang, Ruu-Fen Tzang, Yu-Yu Wu, Ya-Fen Huang, Miao-Chun Chou, Hsin-Yi Liang, Ya-Chen Hsu, Hui-Hua Lu, Yu-Shu Huang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the determinants of adherence to immediate-release (IR) methylphenidate in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); to examine the impact of adherence on ADHD-related symptoms; and to compare the efficacy, adherence, and side effects of IR methylphenidate and osmotic release oral system (OROS) methylphenidate.
METHOD: This national survey, involving 12 hospitals, consisted of 2 phases of assessment. Treatment adherence in 240 (39.5%) of the 607 children aged 5 to 16 years with a clinical diagnosis of DSM-IV ADHD enrolled in the study was poor (defined as missing >or= 1 dose of ADHD medication a day and on 2 days or more during school days). Children with poor adherence at phase 1 were able to switch to OROS methylphenidate, while adherents remained on the IR variant. We reassessed 124 poor adherents who switched to OROS methylphenidate. The global ADHD severity, parent-child interaction, classroom behavior, academic performance, and side effects of the child subjects were evaluated by investigators. Parents completed the rating scales about the ADHD-related symptoms. The study began in April 2005 and was completed in February 2006.
RESULTS: Determinants for poor adherence included older age, later onset of ADHD, family history of ADHD, higher paternal education level, and multi-dose administration. Mental retardation and treatment at medical centers were inversely related to poor adherence. Overall, poor adherence was associated with more severe ADHD-related symptoms by comparison to good adherence. Similar side effect profile, superior adherence, and improved efficacy were demonstrated in intra-individual comparison of the OROS and IR methylphenidate forms.
CONCLUSION: Given that poor adherence to medication may be an important reason for suboptimal outcome in ADHD treatment, physicians should ensure adherence with therapy before adjusting dosage or switching medication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT00460720.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18312048     DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  30 in total

1.  Extended-release medications for children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  M Feldman; S Bélanger
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Remission in children and adolescents diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder via an effective and tolerable titration scheme for osmotic release oral system methylphenidate.

Authors:  Wen-Jiun Chou; Shin-Jaw Chen; Ying-Sheue Chen; Hsin-Yi Liang; Chih-Chien Lin; Ching-Shu Tang; Yu-Shu Huang; Chin-Bin Yeh; Miao-Chun Chou; Dai-Yueh Lin; Po-Hsun Hou; Yu-Yu Wu; Hung-Jen Liu; Ya-Fen Huang; Kai-Ling Hwang; Chin-Hong Chan; Chia-Ho Pan; Hsueh-Ling Chang; Chi-Fen Huang; Ju-Wei Hsu
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 3.  A review of OROS methylphenidate (Concerta(®)) in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Martin A Katzman; Tia Sternat
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Rates and predictors of adherence to psychotropic medications in children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Sarah L Logan; Laura Carpenter; R Scott Leslie; Kelly S Hunt; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Jane Charles; Joyce S Nicholas
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-11

5.  Does helping mothers in multigenerational ADHD also help children in the long run? 2-year follow-up from baseline of the AIMAC randomized controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Julia M Geissler; Timo D Vloet; Nora Strom; Charlotte Jaite; Erika Graf; Viola Kappel; Andreas Warnke; Christian Jacob; Klaus Hennighausen; Barbara Haack-Dees; Katja Schneider-Momm; Swantje Matthies; Michael Rösler; Wolfgang Retz; Susann Hänig; Alexander von Gontard; Esther Sobanski; Barbara Alm; Sarah Hohmann; Luise Poustka; Michael Colla; Laura Gentschow; Christine M Freitag; Alexander Häge; Martin Holtmann; Katja Becker; Alexandra Philipsen; Thomas Jans
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 6.  Delivering evidence-based treatments for child attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the context of parental ADHD.

Authors:  Christine H Wang; Heather Mazursky-Horowitz; Andrea Chronis-Tuscano
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Neural correlates of atomoxetine improving inhibitory control and visual processing in Drug-naïve adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Li-Ying Fan; Tai-Li Chou; Susan Shur-Fen Gau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Childhood methylphenidate adherence as a predictor of antidepressants use during adolescence.

Authors:  Nir Madjar; Dan Shlosberg; Maya Leventer-Roberts; Amichay Akriv; Adi Ghilai; Moshe Hoshen; Amir Krivoy; Gil Zalsman; Gal Shoval
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 9.  ADHD in children and youth: Part 2-Treatment.

Authors:  Mark E Feldman; Alice Charach; Stacey A Bélanger
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Adherence to psychostimulant medication in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the role of attitudes.

Authors:  Julien Hébert; Anna Polotskaia; Ridha Joober; Natalie Grizenko
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.