Literature DB >> 28657141

Neural correlates of atomoxetine improving inhibitory control and visual processing in Drug-naïve adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Li-Ying Fan1,2, Tai-Li Chou2,3, Susan Shur-Fen Gau1,2,3.   

Abstract

Atomoxetine improves inhibitory control and visual processing in healthy volunteers and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, little is known about the neural correlates of these two functions after chronic treatment with atomoxetine. This study aimed to use the counting Stroop task with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) to investigate the changes related to inhibitory control and visual processing in adults with ADHD. This study is an 8-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of atomoxetine in 24 drug-naïve adults with ADHD. We investigated the changes of treatment with atomoxetine compared to placebo-treated counterparts using the counting Stroop fMRI and two CANTAB tests: rapid visual information processing (RVP) for inhibitory control and delayed matching to sample (DMS) for visual processing. Atomoxetine decreased activations in the right inferior frontal gyrus and anterior cingulate cortex, which were correlated with the improvement in inhibitory control assessed by the RVP. Also, atomoxetine increased activation in the left precuneus, which was correlated with the improvement in the mean latency of correct responses assessed by the DMS. Moreover, anterior cingulate activation in the pre-treatment was able to predict the improvements of clinical symptoms. Treatment with atomoxetine may improve inhibitory control to suppress interference and may enhance the visual processing to process numbers. In addition, the anterior cingulate cortex might play an important role as a biological marker for the treatment effectiveness of atomoxetine. Hum Brain Mapp 38:4850-4864, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CANTAB; atomoxetine; counting Stroop fMRI; inhibitory control; visual processing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28657141      PMCID: PMC6867141          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  47 in total

1.  Three parietal circuits for number processing.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Manuela Piazza; Philippe Pinel; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Neural correlates of inhibitory control and visual processing in youths with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a counting Stroop functional MRI study.

Authors:  L-Y Fan; S S-F Gau; T-L Chou
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging--validation study with functional MRI.

Authors:  G Bush; P J Whalen; B R Rosen; M A Jenike; S C McInerney; S L Rauch
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Lenard Adler; Minnie Ames; Olga Demler; Steve Faraone; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Robert Jin; Kristina Secnik; Thomas Spencer; T Bedirhan Ustun; Ellen E Walters
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Differential therapeutic effects of 12-week treatment of atomoxetine and methylphenidate on drug-naïve children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A counting Stroop functional MRI study.

Authors:  Tai-Li Chou; Seng Chia; Chi-Yung Shang; Susan Shur-Fen Gau
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.600

6.  Impairment of fronto-striatal and parietal cerebral networks correlates with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) psychopathology in adults - a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study.

Authors:  Marc F Schneider; Christoph M Krick; Wolfgang Retz; Georges Hengesch; Petra Retz-Junginger; Wolfgang Reith; Michael Rösler
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Executive functions as endophenotypes in ADHD: evidence from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB).

Authors:  Susan Shur-Fen Gau; Chi-Yung Shang
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 8.982

8.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on once-daily atomoxetine in Taiwanese children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Susan S F Gau; Yu-Shu Huang; Wei-Tsuen Soong; Miao-Chun Chou; Wen-Jiun Chou; Chi-Yung Shang; Wan-Ling Tseng; Albert J Allen; Phil Lee
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.576

9.  A head-to-head randomized clinical trial of methylphenidate and atomoxetine treatment for executive function in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Hsing-Chang Ni; Chi-Yung Shang; Susan Shur-Fen Gau; Yu-Ju Lin; Hui-Chun Huang; Li-Kuang Yang
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.176

10.  Rapid visual information processing as a cognitive endophenotype of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  S S-F Gau; W-L Huang
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  5 in total

1.  The use of reaction time distributions to study attention in male rats: the effects of atomoxetine and guanfacine.

Authors:  Zach V Redding; Pooja Chawla; Karen E Sabol
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Visual processing as a potential endophenotype in youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A sibling study design using the counting Stroop functional MRI.

Authors:  Li-Ying Fan; Chi-Yung Shang; Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng; Susan Shur-Fen Gau; Tai-Li Chou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Effector-Specific Characterization of Brain Dynamics in Manual vs. Oculomotor Go/NoGo Tasks.

Authors:  Marie Simonet; Paolo Ruggeri; Jérôme Barral
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Pharmacologic treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jesse Elliott; Amy Johnston; Don Husereau; Shannon E Kelly; Caroline Eagles; Alice Charach; Shu-Ching Hsieh; Zemin Bai; Alomgir Hossain; Becky Skidmore; Eva Tsakonas; Dagmara Chojecki; Muhammad Mamdani; George A Wells
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparative meta-analyses of brain structural and functional abnormalities during cognitive control in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Steve Lukito; Luke Norman; Christina Carlisi; Joaquim Radua; Heledd Hart; Emily Simonoff; Katya Rubia
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 7.723

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.