Literature DB >> 18310360

Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis: a single center's 16-year experience.

Anthony O Odibo1, Diane L Gray, Jeffrey M Dicke, David M Stamilio, George A Macones, James P Crane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate an institution's specific fetal loss rate after a second-trimester genetic amniocentesis.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using our prenatal diagnosis database for all pregnant women presenting for care between 1990 and 2006. We compared the fetal loss rate in women who underwent amniocentesis between 15 and 22 weeks of gestation with those women who did not have any invasive procedure and had a live fetus documented on ultrasound examination between 15 and 22 weeks. Only singleton gestations were included. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders between the groups.
RESULTS: Among 58,436 women meeting the inclusion criteria, complete outcome data were available for 51,557 (88%), 11,746 (91%) in the amniocentesis group and 39,811 (87%) in the group that did not have amniocentesis. The fetal loss (miscarriages and intrauterine fetal death) rate in the amniocentesis group was 0.4% compared with 0.26% in those without amniocentesis (relative risk 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.2). Fetal loss less than 24 weeks (including induction for ruptured membranes and oligohydramnios) occurred in 0.97% of the amniocentesis group and 0.84% of the group with no procedure (P=.33). The fetal loss rate less than 24 weeks attributable to amniocentesis was 0.13% (95% CI -0.07 to 0.20%) or 1 in 769. The only subgroup that had a significantly higher amniocentesis attributable fetal loss rate was women with a normal serum screen (0.17%, P=.03).
CONCLUSION: The institutional fetal loss rate attributable to amniocentesis is 0.13%, or 1 in 769 at Washington University School of Medicine. The total fetal loss rate was not significantly different from that observed in patients who had no procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18310360     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318162eb53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  25 in total

1.  MALDI-TOF MS in Prenatal Genomics.

Authors:  Xiao Yan Zhong; Wolfgang Holzgreve
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Position Statement from the Italian College of Fetal Maternal Medicine: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by maternal plasma DNA sequencing.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2013-04

3.  High resolution non-invasive detection of a fetal microdeletion using the GCREM algorithm.

Authors:  Tianjiao Chu; Suveyda Yeniterzi; Aleksandar Rajkovic; W Allen Hogge; Mary Dunkel; Patricia Shaw; Kimberly Bunce; David G Peters
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Ante-natal counseling in phacomatoses.

Authors:  Dana Brabbing-Goldstein; Shay Ben-Shachar
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Recent advances of genomic testing in perinatal medicine.

Authors:  David G Peters; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Urvashi Surti; Aleksandar Rajkovic
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.300

6.  Factors that affect the decision to undergo amniocentesis in women with normal Down syndrome screening results: it is all about the age.

Authors:  Julia Grinshpun-Cohen; Talya Miron-Shatz; Liat Ries-Levavi; Elon Pras
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now.

Authors:  Errol R Norwitz; Brynn Levy
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

8.  Putting medical risks into perspective.

Authors:  Pooja Rani Patel
Journal:  Clin Pract (Lond)       Date:  2014

9.  Early administration of enzyme replacement therapy for Pompe disease: short-term follow-up results.

Authors:  M A Hamdan; M H Almalik; H M Mirghani
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 10.  The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal genetic syndromes.

Authors:  Shayna N Conner; Ryan E Longman; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.