Literature DB >> 1831006

Expanded clinical evaluation of lovastatin (EXCEL) study results: IV. Additional perspectives on the tolerability of lovastatin.

C A Dujovne1, A N Chremos, J L Pool, H Schnaper, R H Bradford, C L Shear, J Higgins, M Downton, F A Franklin, D T Nash.   

Abstract

This randomized, double-blind, multicenter, diet-and-placebo-controlled study was designed to clarify the dose-response relationship of lovastatin therapy to lipid-modifying efficacy and drug-related adverse events. Exclusion criteria were minimized so that study patients were representative of the majority of patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia seen in medical practice. After 6 weeks on the American Heart Association Step 1 Diet, a total of 8,245 patients were randomly assigned to 48 weeks of treatment with diet and placebo or lovastatin at dosages of 20 or 40 mg once a day or 20 or 40 mg twice a day. All adverse events were monitored, with particular attention to evaluation of liver and muscle. Liver transaminase elevations suggestive of possible hepatotoxicity, defined as successive elevations in either aspartate transaminase or alanine aminotransferase greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal, occurred in equal numbers of placebo and lovastatin 20 mg/day treated patients (0.1%). The frequencies were higher in lovastatin 40 mg/day and 80 mg/day patient groups (0.9 and 1.5%, respectively). No patient was diagnosed as having clinically symptomatic hepatic dysfunction. Creatinine kinase (CK) elevations above the upper limit of normal occurred frequently in placebo- (29%), as well as lovastatin-treated patients (29-35%), and muscle symptoms were reported with similar frequency in all groups (7-9%). The combination of muscle symptoms with marked CK elevations (greater than 10 times the upper limit of normal) was seen in only five patients: one in a 40 mg/day dose group and four in the 80 mg/day dose group. No patient developed rhabdomyolysis. The incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events requiring discontinuation was 6% for the placebo group and from 7% (20 mg/day) to 9% (80 mg/day) for lovastatin treatment groups. No new types of adverse experiences related to lovastatin treatment were reported. Lovastatin, as an adjunct to diet for the reduction of elevated LDL cholesterol, was generally very well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1831006     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90053-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  16 in total

1.  [Myopathy linked to statins in a patient with recently appeared hypothyroidism].

Authors:  C León Rodríguez; M Martínez González
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Lipid Control and Beyond: Current and Future Indications for Statin Therapy in Stroke.

Authors:  Shadi Yaghi; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-04

Review 3.  HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and myotoxicity.

Authors:  M Ucar; T Mjörndal; R Dahlqvist
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic drug interactions with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.

Authors:  David Williams; John Feely
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  How well tolerated are lipid-lowering drugs?

Authors:  B Tomlinson; P Chan; W Lan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Hazards of reducing cholesterol.

Authors:  C Lines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994 Aug 20-27

7.  Lovastatin-induced apoptosis of human medulloblastoma cell lines in vitro.

Authors:  R J Macaulay; W Wang; J Dimitroulakos; L E Becker; H Yeger
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Prediction of the therapeutic response to simvastatin by pretreatment lipid concentrations in 2082 subjects.

Authors:  A R Miserez; F A Rossi; U Keller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in elderly patients following myocardial infarction: are all HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors alike?

Authors:  Bijesh P Maroo; Carl J Lavie; Richard V Milani
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Assessing possible hazards of reducing serum cholesterol.

Authors:  M R Law; S G Thompson; N J Wald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.