Literature DB >> 18309964

Factors associated with uptake of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) and use of single antigen vaccines in a contemporary UK cohort: prospective cohort study.

Anna Pearce1, Catherine Law, David Elliman, Tim J Cole, Helen Bedford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate uptake of the combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) and single antigen vaccines and explore factors associated with uptake and reasons for not using MMR.
DESIGN: Nationally representative cohort study.
SETTING: Children born in the UK, 2000-2. PARTICIPANTS: 14,578 children for whom data on immunisation were available. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Immunisation status at 3 years defined as "immunised with MMR," "immunised with at least one single antigen vaccine," and "unimmunised."
RESULTS: 88.6% (13,013) were immunised with MMR and 5.2% (634) had received at least one single antigen vaccine. Children were more likely to be unimmunised if they lived in a household with other children (risk ratio 1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 2.25, for those living with three or more) or a lone parent (1.31, 1.07 to 1.60) or if their mother was under 20 (1.41, 1.08 to 1.85) or over 34 at cohort child's birth (reaching 2.34, 1.20 to 3.23, for > or =40), more highly educated (1.41, 1.05 to 1.89, for a degree), not employed (1.43, 1.12 to 1.82), or self employed (1.71, 1.18 to 2.47). Use of single vaccines increased with household income (reaching 2.98, 2.05 to 4.32, for incomes of > or = 52,000 pounds sterling (69,750 euros, $102,190)), maternal age (reaching 3.04, 2.05 to 4.50, for > or =40), and education (reaching 3.15, 1.78 to 5.58, for a degree). Children were less likely to have received single vaccines if they lived with other children (reaching 0.14, 0.07 to 0.29, for three or more), had mothers who were Indian (0.50, 0.25 to 0.99), Pakistani or Bangladeshi (0.13, 0.04 to 0.39), or black (0.31, 0.14 to 0.64), or aged under 25 (reaching 0.14, 0.05 to 0.36, for 14-19). Nearly three quarters (74.4%, 1110) of parents who did not immunise with MMR made a "conscious decision" not to immunise.
CONCLUSIONS: Although MMR uptake in this cohort is high, a substantial proportion of children remain susceptible to avoidable infection, largely because parents consciously decide not to immunise. Social differentials in uptake could be used to inform targeted interventions to promote uptake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18309964      PMCID: PMC2287222          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.590671.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  27 in total

1.  Apparent low immunisation uptake in Dublin: under-performance or under-recording?

Authors:  P M Harrington; C Woodman; W F Shannon
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  2000-11

2.  Comparison of social distribution of immunisation with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, England, 1991-2001.

Authors:  Elizabeth Middleton; Deborah Baker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-19

3.  Accuracy of routine data on MMR vaccination coverage and validity of parental recall of vaccination.

Authors:  G Lyratzopoulos; R Aston; K Bailey; J Flitcroft; H Clarke
Journal:  Commun Dis Public Health       Date:  2002-12

4.  Predicting uptake of MMR vaccination: a prospective questionnaire study.

Authors:  Mary Flynn; Jane Ogden
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Medicine and the media: MMR: the scare stories are back.

Authors:  Ben Goldacre
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-18

6.  Tracking mothers' attitudes to MMR immunisation 1996-2006.

Authors:  Alan Smith; Joanne Yarwood; David M Salisbury
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Mothers' reports of childhood vaccinations and infections and their concordance with general practitioner records.

Authors:  P A McKinney; F E Alexander; C Nicholson; R A Cartwright; J Carrette
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1991-02

8.  Parents' perspectives on the MMR immunisation: a focus group study.

Authors:  M Evans; H Stoddart; L Condon; E Freeman; M Grizzell; R Mullen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Accuracy of parental reporting of immunization.

Authors:  Hossam H M AbdelSalam; Myron M Sokal
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.168

10.  The contribution of single antigen measles, mumps and rubella vaccines to immunity to these infections in England and Wales.

Authors:  Pam Sonnenberg; Natasha S Crowcroft; Joanne M White; Mary E Ramsay
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.791

View more
  44 in total

1.  An intensive 5-year-long influenza vaccination campaign is effective among doctors but not nurses.

Authors:  A Friedl; C Aegerter; E Saner; D Meier; J H Beer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Improving uptake of MMR vaccine.

Authors:  Peter McIntyre; Julie Leask
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-28

Review 3.  Accessing hard to reach groups, travelers and looked after children.

Authors:  Fiona Print
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Attention focuses on autism.

Authors:  Karen Honey
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  The globalization of risk and risk perception: why we need a new model of risk communication for vaccines.

Authors:  Heidi Larson; Pauline Brocard Paterson; Ngozi Erondu
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Knowledge and risk perception of measles and factors associated with vaccination decisions in subjects consulting university affiliated public hospitals in Lyon, France, after measles infection.

Authors:  Abdoulaye Toure; Mitra Saadatian-Elahi; Daniel Floret; Bruno Lina; Jean-Sebastien Casalegno; Philippe Vanhems
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Impact of a pertussis epidemic on infant vaccination in Washington state.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Wolf; Douglas Opel; M Patricia DeHart; Jodi Warren; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Intentions to receive a potentially available Lyme disease vaccine in an urban sample.

Authors:  Joshua Fogel; Martin Kusz
Journal:  Ther Adv Vaccines       Date:  2016-01-01

9.  Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination has no effect on cognitive development in children - the results of the Polish prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dorota Mrozek-Budzyn; Agnieszka Kiełtyka; Renata Majewska; Małgorzata Augustyniak
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Migration and child immunization in Nigeria: individual- and community-level contexts.

Authors:  Diddy Antai
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.