Literature DB >> 17395344

Tracking mothers' attitudes to MMR immunisation 1996-2006.

Alan Smith1, Joanne Yarwood, David M Salisbury.   

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of surveys that have tracked mothers' attitudes towards MMR over the period 1996-2006. The main aim was to demonstrate how attitudes in relation to MMR have evolved over the last 10 years incorporating the periods of time before, during and after the height of the MMR controversy within the UK. MMR vaccine remains the number one 'top of mind' vaccination issue for parents. The proportion of parents believing MMR to be a greater risk than the diseases it protects against has fallen from 24% in 2002 to 14% in 2006. The proportion of 'hard-core rejectors' of MMR vaccine remains stable at 6%. There has been a gradual and sustained increase in the proportion of parents across all social groups saying MMR was completely safe/slight risk rising from 60% in 2002 to a current level of 74%. There now appears to be a sustained move away from fears over MMR safety and belief in the unfounded link to autism towards a more positive perception of the vaccine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17395344     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.02.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  27 in total

1.  An intensive 5-year-long influenza vaccination campaign is effective among doctors but not nurses.

Authors:  A Friedl; C Aegerter; E Saner; D Meier; J H Beer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  MMR: where are we now?

Authors:  David Elliman; Helen Bedford
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Improving uptake of MMR vaccine.

Authors:  Peter McIntyre; Julie Leask
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-28

4.  Reactogenicity of Cervarix and Gardasil human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines in a randomized single blind trial in healthy UK adolescent females.

Authors:  Tao Haskins-Coulter; Jo Southern; Nick Andrews; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Vaccine hesitancy: an overview.

Authors:  Eve Dubé; Caroline Laberge; Maryse Guay; Paul Bramadat; Réal Roy; Julie Bettinger
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Impact of a vaccination promotion intervention using motivational interview techniques on long-term vaccine coverage: the PromoVac strategy.

Authors:  Thomas Lemaitre; Nathalie Carrier; Anne Farrands; Virginie Gosselin; Geneviève Petit; Arnaud Gagneur
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Factors associated with uptake of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) and use of single antigen vaccines in a contemporary UK cohort: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Pearce; Catherine Law; David Elliman; Tim J Cole; Helen Bedford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-28

8.  Parental attitudes and information needs in an adolescent HPV vaccination programme.

Authors:  R Stretch; S A Roberts; R McCann; D Baxter; G Chambers; H Kitchener; L Brabin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Newsprint media representations of the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme for cervical cancer prevention in the UK (2005-2008).

Authors:  Shona Hilton; Kate Hunt; Mairi Langan; Helen Bedford; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Cost effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for parents deciding about MMR vaccination: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.

Authors:  Sandy Tubeuf; Richard Edlin; Swati Shourie; Francine M Cheater; Hilary Bekker; Cath Jackson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.