Literature DB >> 18307597

Consumer attitudes towards the use of routine outcome measures in a public mental health service: a consumer-driven study.

David Guthrie1, Mishka McIntosh, Tom Callaly, Tom Trauer, Tim Coombs.   

Abstract

In this study conducted by consumer consultants, 50 consumers who have a Barwon Health case manager (the majority of whom were nurses) were interviewed using a structured questionnaire to ascertain their attitudes towards the routine use of outcome measures. Forty participants (80% of those interviewed) reported they had been offered the Behaviour and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-32) to complete in routine care by their case managers and of those, 95% (n = 38) completed it. On those who completed the BASIS-32, 42% said their case manager had explained what the BASIS-32 would be used for, 45% said that the case manager had discussed their responses with them, 76% stated that completing the BASIS-32 had helped the case manager to understand them better and 66% believed that completing the BASIS-32 had led to them receiving better care. Only 30% of the group interviewed were aware that their case manager regularly completed a Health of the Nation Outcome Scales and Life Skills Profile. Feedback about the process of completing the BASIS-32 was obtained as well as suggestions on how the process may be improved. The results indicate that consumers see the benefit of routine outcome measurement and believe it leads to improved care. More information about outcome measures, including the clinician-rated outcome measures, needs to be provided to consumers if they are to be engaged constructively in this exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18307597     DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2008.00516.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  7 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes management: incorporating and sustaining processes critical to using outcome data to guide practice improvement.

Authors:  Kay Hodges; James R Wotring
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Determinants and Functions of Standardized Assessment Use Among School Mental Health Clinicians: A Mixed Methods Evaluation.

Authors:  Aaron R Lyon; Kristy Ludwig; Jessica Knaster Wasse; Alex Bergstrom; Ethan Hendrix; Elizabeth McCauley
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-01

3.  Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Current Assessment Practice Evaluation-Revised (CAPER) in a National Sample.

Authors:  Aaron R Lyon; Michael D Pullmann; Shannon Dorsey; Prerna Martin; Alexandra A Grigore; Emily M Becker; Amanda Jensen-Doss
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  The incremental value of self-reported mental health measures in predicting functional outcomes of veterans.

Authors:  Susan V Eisen; Kathryn A Bottonari; Mark E Glickman; Avron Spiro; Mark R Schultz; Lawrence Herz; Robert Rosenheck; Ethan S Rofman
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.505

5.  Student Perceptions of the Acceptability and Utility of Standardized and Idiographic Assessment in School Mental Health.

Authors:  Mylien T Duong; Aaron R Lyon; Kristy Ludwig; Jessica Knaster Wasse; Elizabeth McCauley
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Promot       Date:  2016-02-05

6.  Achievements in mental health outcome measurement in Australia: Reflections on progress made by the Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network (AMHOCN).

Authors:  Philip Burgess; Tim Coombs; Adam Clarke; Rosemary Dickson; Jane Pirkis
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2012-05-28

7.  Usability evaluation of a web-based support system for people with a schizophrenia diagnosis.

Authors:  Lian van der Krieke; Ando C Emerencia; Marco Aiello; Sjoerd Sytema
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.