Literature DB >> 18307583

First radiation hybrid map of the river buffalo X chromosome (BBUX) and comparison with BTAX.

P Ianella1, L P R Venancio, N B Stafuzza, M N Miziara, R Agarwala, A A Schäffer, P K Riggs, J E Womack, M E J Amaral.   

Abstract

We report the first radiation hybrid map of the river buffalo X chromosome generated from a recently constructed river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) whole-genome radiation hybrid panel (BBURH(5000)). This map contains a total of 33 cattle-derived markers, including 10 genes, four ESTs and 19 microsatellites. The markers are distributed in two linkage groups: LG1 contains eight markers spanning 125.6 cR, and LG2 contains 25 markers spanning 366.3 cR. LG1 contains six markers in common with bovine sequence assembly build 3.1. With the exception of BMS2152, the order of these markers on our BBUX map is shuffled when compared to the cow X chromosome (Bos taurus; BTAX). From LG2, two markers (AMELX and BL22) map to a more distal portion of BTAX compared to BBUX. In addition, two pairs of LG2 markers exhibit inversions compared to BTAX (ILSTS017 and ATRX; XBM38 and PPEF1). Alternatively, when compared to the most recent bovine RH map (Bov-Gen 3000rads), BL1098 and BMS2227 from LG1 as well as PLS3 and BMS1820 from LG2 showed inverted positions on the BBUX map. These discrepancies in buffalo and cattle maps may reflect evolutionary divergence of the chromosomes or mapping errors in one of the two species. Although the set of mapped markers does not cover the entire X chromosome, this map is a starting point for the construction of a high-resolution map, which is necessary for characterization of small rearrangements that might have occurred between the Bubalus bubalis and Bos taurus X chromosomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18307583     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01696.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Genet        ISSN: 0268-9146            Impact factor:   3.169


  5 in total

1.  Advanced comparative cytogenetic analysis of X chromosomes in river buffalo, cattle, sheep, and human.

Authors:  A Perucatti; V Genualdo; A Iannuzzi; A Rebl; D Di Berardino; T Goldammer; Leopoldo Iannuzzi
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  Water buffalo genome science comes of age.

Authors:  Vanessa N Michelizzi; Michael V Dodson; Zengxiang Pan; M Elisabete J Amaral; Jennifer J Michal; Derek J McLean; James E Womack; Zhihua Jiang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 6.580

3.  An extended river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis, 2n = 50) cytogenetic map: assignment of 68 autosomal loci by FISH-mapping and R-banding and comparison with human chromosomes.

Authors:  G P Di Meo; A Perucatti; S Floriot; H Hayes; L Schibler; D Incarnato; D Di Berardino; J Williams; E Cribiu; A Eggen; L Iannuzzi
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Novel insights into the genetic basis of buffalo reproductive performance.

Authors:  Jun Li; Jiajia Liu; Giuseppe Campanile; Graham Plastow; Chunyan Zhang; Zhiquan Wang; Martino Cassandro; Bianca Gasparrini; Angela Salzano; Guohua Hua; Aixin Liang; Liguo Yang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  A first generation whole genome RH map of the river buffalo with comparison to domestic cattle.

Authors:  M Elisabete J Amaral; Jason R Grant; Penny K Riggs; Nedenia B Stafuzza; Edson A Rodrigues Filho; Tom Goldammer; Rosemarie Weikard; Ronald M Brunner; Kelli J Kochan; Anthony J Greco; Jooha Jeong; Zhipeng Cai; Guohui Lin; Aparna Prasad; Satish Kumar; G Pardha Saradhi; Boby Mathew; M Aravind Kumar; Melissa N Miziara; Paola Mariani; Alexandre R Caetano; Stephan R Galvão; Madhu S Tantia; Ramesh K Vijh; Bina Mishra; S T Bharani Kumar; Vanderlei A Pelai; Andre M Santana; Larissa C Fornitano; Brittany C Jones; Humberto Tonhati; Stephen Moore; Paul Stothard; James E Womack
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.969

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.