| Literature DB >> 30419816 |
Jun Li1,2, Jiajia Liu1, Giuseppe Campanile3, Graham Plastow4, Chunyan Zhang4, Zhiquan Wang4, Martino Cassandro5, Bianca Gasparrini3, Angela Salzano3, Guohua Hua1, Aixin Liang6, Liguo Yang7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fertility is a complex trait that has a major impact on the development of the buffalo industry. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) has increased the ability to detect genes influencing complex traits, and many important genes related to reproductive traits have been identified in ruminants. However, reproductive traits are influenced by many factors. The development of the follicle is one of the most important internal processes affecting fertility. Genes found by GWAS to be associated with follicular development may directly affect fertility. The present study combined GWAS and RNA-seq of follicular granulosa cells to identify important genes which may affect fertility in the buffalo.Entities:
Keywords: Follicle; GWAS; Gene expression; IGFBP7; Reproduction
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30419816 PMCID: PMC6233259 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5208-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Genes near to the most suggestive SNPs (P < 0.0001) for six reproductive traits
| Traits | SNP ID | Chr | Position(bp) | Within Gene | Nearst Gene |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCA | AX-85104022 | 15 | 15,493,494 | – |
|
| AX-85147160 | 15 | 15,464,584 | – |
| |
| AX-85066093 | 3 | 14,263,986 | – |
| |
| SCA | AX-85115405 | 3 | 14,360,109 | – |
|
| AX-85098201 | 7 | 40,737,269 | – |
| |
| AX-85077363 | 1 | 31,982,649 | – |
| |
| AX-85041155 | 1 | 31,452,080 | – |
| |
| AX-85178307 | 7 | 46,586,723 | – |
| |
| TCA | AX-85178307 | 7 | 46,586,723 | – |
|
| AX-85097354 | 16 | 59,785,310 | – |
| |
| AX-85109602 | 28 | 32,271,813 | – |
| |
| AX-85092311 | 18 | 46,969,939 |
| – | |
| AX-85115405 | 3 | 14,360,109 | – |
| |
| AX-85160204 | 6 | 74,395,035 | – |
| |
| AX-85115163 | 19 | 21,212,867 | – |
| |
| AX-85128429 | 3 | 8,311,409 |
| – | |
| AX-85127260 | 28 | 32,296,913 | – |
| |
| AX-85060416 | 12 | 3,071,256 | – |
| |
| NSC | AX-85122558 | 2 | 54,971,771 | – |
|
| AX-85080363 | 20 | 48,102,049 | – |
| |
| AX-85149823 | 27 | 41,131,140 | – |
| |
| AX-85080722 | 2 | 55,117,009 | – |
| |
| AX-85118378 | 27 | 37,743,905 | – |
| |
| AX-85069249 | 28 | 32,035,318 | – |
| |
| AX-85069116 | 20 | 47,969,440 | – |
| |
| OD | AX-85166811 | 5 | 2,459,053 | – |
|
| AX-85107057 | 5 | 2,430,266 | – |
| |
| AX-85107924 | 5 | 2,493,145 | – |
| |
| AX-85078259 | 5 | 2,531,719 | – |
| |
| AX-85136537 | 5 | 2,378,071 |
| – | |
| AX-85092056 | 5 | 2,670,570 | – |
| |
| AX-85058327 | 4 | 89,251,931 | – |
| |
| AX-85129886 | 5 | 5,220,162 | – |
| |
| AX-85080072 | 4 | 100,837,591 | – |
| |
| CI | AX-85097797 | 10 | 69,031,255 | – |
|
| AX-85056150 | 12 | 70,335,740 | – |
| |
| AX-85091977 | 23 | 51,462,571 | – |
| |
| AX-85082041 | 6 | 5,090,318 | – |
| |
| AX-85127260 | 28 | 32,296,913 | – |
| |
| AX-85154020 | 3 | 56,690,373 | – |
|
FCA Age at first calving, SCA Age at second calving, TCA Age at third calving, CI Calving interval, NSC The number of artificial insemination, OD The open days. Chr and Position were obtained based on the cattle genome (Bos taurus UMD3.1 assembly)
Fig. 1Manhattan plot for GWAS of open days in buffalo. OD, open days; x-axis, physical positions of SNPs by chromosome based on Bos taurus UMD3.1 genome assembly; y-axis, −log10 (P-values)
Fig. 2Linkage disequilibrium pattern for 11 SNPs, which have significant effects on OD by GWAS between 2 - 3Mbp on BTA5. Linkage disequilibrium block is presented in a triangle box based on LD (squared correlation coefficient, r2)
The expression level of genes associated with buffalo reproduction traits identified by GWAS during four stages of buffalo follicle growth
| Gene | Length (bp) | RPKM* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 5 mm | 5~ 8 mm | 8~ 12 mm | > 12 mm | ||
|
| 1107 | 723.49 | 840.17 | 965.37 | 883.67 |
|
| 1601 | 215.46 | 254.71 | 317.72 | 322.20 |
|
| 994 | 76.32 | 75.14 | 81.12 | 93.92 |
|
| 2844 | 28.63 | 67.29 | 40.74 | 15.93 |
|
| 1845 | 27.68 | 23.66 | 36.08 | 33.39 |
|
| 3514 | 21.09 | 20.43 | 25.47 | 15.84 |
|
| 5219 | 15.44 | 31.11 | 35.43 | 23.79 |
|
| 1830 | 10.96 | 8.31 | 8.36 | 9.72 |
|
| 1258 | 7.67 | 20.06 | 9.86 | 4.39 |
|
| 5716 | 7.62 | 10.25 | 10.50 | 11.03 |
|
| 4580 | 7.57 | 10.44 | 6.95 | 3.13 |
|
| 3406 | 7.41 | 12.83 | 6.21 | 4.13 |
|
| 2273 | 4.20 | 4.49 | 7.27 | 4.51 |
|
| 3199 | 3.53a | 0.87ab | 0.42b | 0.37b |
|
| 5860 | 3.51 | 4.93 | 3.85 | 1.71 |
|
| 6373 | 3.38 | 3.92 | 2.40 | 1.66 |
|
| 5697 | 3.23 | 3.79 | 3.61 | 1.42 |
|
| 7235 | 2.14 | 5.73 | 2.46 | 1.42 |
|
| 6346 | 1.89 | 1.65 | 2.55 | 2.12 |
|
| 3342 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.04 | – |
|
| 8110 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
|
| 2401 | 0.03 | 0.06 | – | – |
|
| 2333 | – | – | 0.04 | 0.03 |
|
| 3417 | – | 0.02 | – | – |
|
| 3174 | – | 0.09 | – | 0.07 |
*RPKM Reads per kb per million reads. #CSGALNACT1: significanty differentially expressed gene (FDR < 0.05). The different superscript letters showed significant level
Fig. 3Expression of selected genes mRNA in buffalo granulosa cells detected by q-PCR compared with RNA-seq
Fig. 4Apoptosis, proliferation and cycle analysis of buffalo granulosa cells (GCs) after transfection with IGFBP7 ssRNAi. a Expression of IGFBP7in buffalo GCs detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Line 1 and 2 correspond to IGFBP7 and GADPH. b The mRNA expression level of IGFBP7 after transfection with IGFBP7 ssRNAi. c Analysis of buffalo GCs proliferation after knockdown of IGFBP7 with the absorbance at 450 nm. d and e showed analysis of cycles and apoptosis of buffalo granulosa cells after transfection with IGFBP7 ssRNAi, respectively. The values in each bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). The different superscripts and the symbol of * on bars showed significant level (P < 0.05)
Fig. 5Effects on different apoptotic factors after knockdown of IGFBP7 in buffalo GCs. The mRNA expression of each apoptotic related genes was presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). The symbol of * on bars showed significant level (P < 0.05). n.s. means none-significant
Fig. 6Production of progesterone and E2 and the expression level of related genes after knockdown of IGFBP7 in buffalo GCs. a Detection of progesterone and E2 secretion by ELISA Kit. b Analysis of mRNA expression level of hormone related genes. The values in each bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). The different superscripts on bars showed significant level (P < 0.05). n.s. means none-significant
Descriptive statistics of studied reproduction traits
| Traits | Records | Mean | SD | Max | Min |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCA | 483 | 1015.44 | 157.08 | 1769 | 574 |
| SCA | 398 | 1491.70 | 208.64 | 2317 | 797 |
| TCA | 230 | 1908.86 | 255.79 | 3071 | 1185 |
| CI | 891 | 431.55 | 75.67 | 657 | 235 |
| NSC | 1110 | 2.27 | 0.68 | 6 | 1 |
| OD | 1008 | 120.04 | 61.58 | 270 | 40 |
SD Standard deviation, FCA Age at first calving, SCA Age at second calving, TCA Age at third calving, CI Calving interval, NSC The number of artificial insemination, OD Open days