Literature DB >> 18307457

Differences in height explain gender differences in the response to the oral glucose tolerance test- the AusDiab study.

R A Sicree1, P Z Zimmet, D W Dunstan, A J Cameron, T A Welborn, J E Shaw.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the extent of gender-related differences in the prevalence of glucose intolerance for the Australian population and whether body size may explain such differences.
METHODS: Cross-sectional data were collected from a national cohort of 11 247 Australians aged > or = 25 years. Glucose tolerance status was assessed according to both fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-h plasma glucose (2hPG) levels following a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Anthropometric and glycated haemoglobin measurements were also made.
RESULTS: Undiagnosed diabetes and non-diabetic glucose abnormalities were more prevalent among men than women when based only on the FPG results (diabetes: men 2.2%, women 1.6%, P = 0.02; impaired fasting glycaemia: men 12.3%, women 6.6%, P < 0.001). In contrast 16.0% of women and 13.0% of men had a 2hPG abnormality (either diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance, P = 0.14). Women had a mean FPG 0.3 mmol/l lower than men (P < 0.001), but 2hPG 0.3 mmol/l higher (P = 0.002) and FPG-2hPG increment 0.5 mmol/l greater (P < 0.001). The gender difference in mean 2hPG and FPG-2hPG increment disappeared following adjustment for height. For both genders, those in the shortest height quartile had 2hPG levels 0.5 mmol/l higher than the tallest quartile, but height showed almost no relationship with the FPG.
CONCLUSIONS: Men and women had different glycaemic profiles; women had higher mean 2hPG levels, despite lower fasting levels. It appeared that the higher 2hPG levels for women related to lesser height and may be a consequence of using a fixed glucose load in the OGTT, irrespective of body size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18307457     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02362.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  42 in total

Review 1.  Sexual Dimorphism in Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Risk Factors Among Vegetarians: an Exploration of the Potential Mechanisms.

Authors:  Michelle Adams; Joan Sabaté
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Sex differences in metabolism and cardiometabolic disorders.

Authors:  Karthickeyan Chella Krishnan; Margarete Mehrabian; Aldons J Lusis
Journal:  Curr Opin Lipidol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.776

Review 3.  Gender differences in glucose homeostasis and diabetes.

Authors:  Franck Mauvais-Jarvis
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-08-24

4.  The frequency of prediabetes and contributing factors in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Effat Razeghi; Peimaneh Heydarian; Mahshid Heydari
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2011-08-10

Review 5.  Different physiological mechanisms underlie an adverse cardiovascular disease risk profile in men and women.

Authors:  Alan Fappi; Bettina Mittendorfer
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 6.297

6.  Sex differences in glucose levels: a consequence of physiology or methodological convenience? The Inter99 study.

Authors:  K Faerch; K Borch-Johnsen; A Vaag; T Jørgensen; D R Witte
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Effects of gender and height on the oral glucose tolerance test: the isfahan diabetes prevention study.

Authors:  Mohsen Janghorbani; Massoud Amini
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2008-11-10

Review 8.  Differences by sex in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Esayas Haregot Hilawe; Hiroshi Yatsuya; Leo Kawaguchi; Atsuko Aoyama
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  HbA1c, fasting and 2 h plasma glucose in current, ex- and never-smokers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Soraya Soulimane; Dominique Simon; William H Herman; Celine Lange; Crystal M Y Lee; Stephen Colagiuri; Jonathan E Shaw; Paul Z Zimmet; Dianna Magliano; Sandra R G Ferreira; Yanghu Dong; Lei Zhang; Torben Jorgensen; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Viswanathan Mohan; Dirk L Christensen; Lydia Kaduka; Jacqueline M Dekker; Giel Nijpels; Coen D A Stehouwer; Olivier Lantieri; Wilfred Y Fujimoto; Donna L Leonetti; Marguerite J McNeely; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Edward J Boyko; Dorte Vistisen; Beverley Balkau
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Activation of brown adipose tissue in diet-induced thermogenesis is GC-C dependent.

Authors:  Nikola Habek; Marina Dobrivojević Radmilović; Milan Kordić; Katarina Ilić; Sandra Grgić; Vladimir Farkaš; Robert Bagarić; Siniša Škokić; Alfred Švarc; Aleksandra Dugandžić
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.