Literature DB >> 18307012

Update of evidence in chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Hiroyasu Yamashiro1, Masakazu Toi.   

Abstract

Although recent progress in drug therapy has facilitated marked advances in chemotherapy for breast cancer, little has been achieved in the development of individualized chemotherapy. Prognostic factors such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) have recently been incorporated into risk classification in the guidelines as predictive factors for treatment response, indicating that the treatment decisions for breast cancer have shifted to factors predictive of treatment response. For the selection of optimum adjuvant chemotherapy, the prediction of treatment responses and judgment of benefits and risks for individual patients are necessary, in addition to the guidelines, for which the investigation of clinical study results, the utilization of computer-based treatment decision tools, and gene profiling may be important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18307012     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-007-0719-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  27 in total

1.  Topoisomerase IIalpha gene amplification predicts favorable treatment response to tailored and dose-escalated anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy in HER-2/neu-amplified breast cancer: Scandinavian Breast Group Trial 9401.

Authors:  Minna Tanner; Jorma Isola; Tom Wiklund; Björn Erikstein; Pirkko Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Per Malmström; Nils Wilking; Jonas Nilsson; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants.

Authors:  A H Tong; M Evangelista; A B Parsons; H Xu; G D Bader; N Pagé; M Robinson; S Raghibizadeh; C W Hogue; H Bussey; B Andrews; M Tyers; C Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Martin; Tadeusz Pienkowski; John Mackey; Marek Pawlicki; Jean-Paul Guastalla; Charles Weaver; Eva Tomiak; Taher Al-Tweigeri; Linnea Chap; Eva Juhos; Raymond Guevin; Anthony Howell; Tommy Fornander; John Hainsworth; Robert Coleman; Jeferson Vinholes; Manuel Modiano; Tamas Pinter; Shou C Tang; Bruce Colwell; Catherine Prady; Louise Provencher; David Walde; Alvaro Rodriguez-Lescure; Judith Hugh; Camille Loret; Matthieu Rupin; Sandra Blitz; Philip Jacobs; Michael Murawsky; Alessandro Riva; Charles Vogel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; E Claire Dees; Lynda Sawyer; Lisa Gatti; Dominic T Moore; Frances Collichio; David W Ollila; Carolyn I Sartor; Mark L Graham; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Constance Cirrincione; I Craig Henderson; Marc L Citron; Daniel R Budman; Lori J Goldstein; Silvana Martino; Edith A Perez; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Identification of candidate molecular markers predicting sensitivity in solid tumors to dasatinib: rationale for patient selection.

Authors:  Fei Huang; Karen Reeves; Xia Han; Craig Fairchild; Suso Platero; Tai W Wong; Francis Lee; Peter Shaw; Edwin Clark
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  HER2 and choice of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-15.

Authors:  S Paik; J Bryant; E Tan-Chiu; G Yothers; C Park; D L Wickerham; N Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  retrospective analysis of topoisomerase IIa amplifications and deletions as predictive markers in primary breast cancer patients randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

Authors:  Ann S Knoop; Helle Knudsen; Eva Balslev; Birgitte B Rasmussen; Jens Overgaard; Kirsten V Nielsen; Andreas Schonau; Katrín Gunnarsdóttir; Karen E Olsen; Henning Mouridsen; Bent Ejlertsen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Improved outcomes from adding sequential Paclitaxel but not from escalating Doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer.

Authors:  I Craig Henderson; Donald A Berry; George D Demetri; Constance T Cirrincione; Lori J Goldstein; Silvana Martino; James N Ingle; M Robert Cooper; Daniel F Hayes; Katherine H Tkaczuk; Gini Fleming; James F Holland; David B Duggan; John T Carpenter; Emil Frei; Richard L Schilsky; William C Wood; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Joan Duch; David Fuster; Montserrat Muñoz; Pedro Luís Fernández; Pilar Paredes; Montserrat Fontanillas; Flavia Guzmán; Sebastià Rubí; Francisco Juan Lomeña; Francesca Pons
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 9.236

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.