Literature DB >> 1830700

Pain response to sagittal end-range spinal motion. A prospective, randomized, multicentered trial.

R Donelson1, W Grant, C Kamps, R Medcalf.   

Abstract

This article reports a prospective, randomized, multicentered study documenting changes in the intensity and location of low-back and referred pain to repeated end-range lumbar flexion and extension movements performed first while standing and then while recumbent during a single clinical patient evaluation. Significant and rapid changes in central and distal pain intensity and location of peripheral pain resulted from the performance of these movements. For the mean in both protocols, regardless of the order of spinal movements, end-range extension significantly decreased central and distal pain intensity and centralized referred pain. Flexion spinal movements, however, significantly increased mean central and distal pain intensity and peripheralized the pain. Forty percent of individual subjects had a clear preference for extension and 7% a clear preference for flexion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1830700     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199106001-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  The cost-effectiveness of a treatment-based classification system for low back pain: design of a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Adri T Apeldoorn; Raymond W Ostelo; Hans van Helvoirt; Julie M Fritz; Henrika C W de Vet; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Centralization in patients with sciatica: are pain responses to repeated movement and positioning associated with outcome or types of disc lesions?

Authors:  Hanne B Albert; Eva Hauge; Claus Manniche
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Can we predict response to the McKenzie method in patients with acute low back pain? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Charles Sheets; Luciana A C Machado; Mark Hancock; Chris Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Specific directional exercises for patients with low back pain: a case series.

Authors:  Audrey Long; Stephen May; Tak Fung
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Prevalence of classification methods for patients with lumbar impairments using the McKenzie syndromes, pain pattern, manipulation, and stabilization clinical prediction rules.

Authors:  Mark W Werneke; Dennis Hart; Dave Oliver; Troy McGill; David Grigsby; Jason Ward; Jon Weinberg; William Oswald; Guillermo Cutrone
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-12

6.  Inter-rater reliability of a modified version of Delitto et al.'s classification-based system for low back pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Adri T Apeldoorn; Hans van Helvoirt; Raymond W Ostelo; Hanneke Meihuizen; Steven J Kamper; Maurits W van Tulder; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-05

7.  A mechanical diagnosis and treatment (MDT) approach for a patient with discogenic low back pain and a relevant lateral component: a case report.

Authors:  Bryan Williams; Dan Vaughn; Teri Holwerda
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-05

8.  Further examination of modifying patient-preferred movement and alignment strategies in patients with low back pain during symptomatic tests.

Authors:  Linda R Van Dillen; Katrina S Maluf; Shirley A Sahrmann
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2007-11-26

9.  Clinical predictors of lumbar provocation discography: a study of clinical predictors of lumbar provocation discography.

Authors:  Mark Laslett; Charles N Aprill; Barry McDonald; Birgitta Oberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of the painful sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Mark Laslett
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.