Literature DB >> 18306154

Treatment of resistant tattoos using a new generation Q-switched Nd:YAG laser: influence of beam profile and spot size on clearance success.

Syrus Karsai1, Gudrun Pfirrmann, Stefan Hammes, Christian Raulin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Multiple treatments of resistant tattoos often result in fibrosis and visible textural changes that lessen response to subsequent treatments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of beam profile and spot size on clearance rates and side effects in the setting of resistant tattoos. STUDY DESIGN/
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six professional, black tattoos (32 patients) were treated unsuccessfully with a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (MedLite C3, HoyaConBio Inc., Fremont, CA). Because of therapy resistance all tattoos were re-treated using a new generation Nd:YAG laser (MedLite C6, HoyaConBio Inc.). Maximum energy fluence (E (max)), mean energy fluence, mean spot size, level of clearance, side effects and beam profile (irradiance distribution) of both laser systems were assessed and evaluated in a retrospective study.
RESULTS: All tattoos were previously treated with the C3 laser at 1,064 nm using a mean E(max) of 5.8+/-0.8 J/cm(2) (range 3.8-7.5 J/cm(2)) as compared with a mean E(max) of 6.4+/-1.6 J/cm(2) (range 3.2-9.0 J/cm(2)) during the C6 treatment course. Corresponding spot sizes were larger during C6 treatments as compared with C3 (5.0+/-0.9 and 3.6+/-0.2 mm, respectively). The C6 laser had a "flat top" and homogenous profile regardless of the spot size. For the C3 laser the beam shape was "Gaussian," and the homogeneity was reduced by numerous micro-spikes and micro-nadirs. After the C6 treatment course 33.3% of the tattoos showed clearance of grade 1 (0-25%), 16.7% of grade 2 (26-50%), 16.7% of grade 3 (51-75%), 30.5% of grade 4 (76-95%), 2.8% of grade 5 (96-100%). The total rate of side effects due to C6 treatment was 8.3% in all tattoos (hyperpigmentation 5.6%, hypopigmentation 2.7%, textural changes/scars 0%).
CONCLUSION: This clinical study documents for the first time the impact of a 1,064-nm Nd:YAG laser with a more homogenous beam profile and a larger spot size on the management of resistant tattoos. Only a few treatment sessions were necessary to achieve an additional clearance with a low rate of side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18306154     DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  4 in total

Review 1.  Lasers for tattoo removal: a review.

Authors:  Sonal Choudhary; Mohamed L Elsaie; Angel Leiva; Keyvan Nouri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Causes and recommendations for unanticipated ink retention following tattoo removal treatment.

Authors:  William Kirby; Cynthia L Chen; Alpesh Desai; Tejas Desai
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2013-07

3.  Laser tattoo removal: a clinical update.

Authors:  Stephanie Gy Ho; Chee Leok Goh
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

4.  A webcam in Bayer-mode as a light beam profiler for the near infra-red.

Authors:  Gregor Langer; Armin Hochreiner; Peter Burgholzer; Thomas Berer
Journal:  Opt Lasers Eng       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.836

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.