Literature DB >> 18305937

Competition and coexistence of sulfate-reducing bacteria, acetogens and methanogens in a lab-scale anaerobic bioreactor as affected by changing substrate to sulfate ratio.

Shabir A Dar1, Robbert Kleerebezem, Alfons J M Stams, J Gijs Kuenen, Gerard Muyzer.   

Abstract

The microbial population structure and function of natural anaerobic communities maintained in lab-scale continuously stirred tank reactors at different lactate to sulfate ratios and in the absence of sulfate were analyzed using an integrated approach of molecular techniques and chemical analysis. The population structure, determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and by the use of oligonucleotide probes, was linked to the functional changes in the reactors. At the influent lactate to sulfate molar ratio of 0.35 mol mol(-1), i.e., electron donor limitation, lactate oxidation was mainly carried out by incompletely oxidizing sulfate-reducing bacteria, which formed 80-85% of the total bacterial population. Desulfomicrobium- and Desulfovibrio-like species were the most abundant sulfate-reducing bacteria. Acetogens and methanogenic Archaea were mostly outcompeted, although less than 2% of an acetogenic population could still be observed at this limiting concentration of lactate. In the near absence of sulfate (i.e., at very high lactate/sulfate ratio), acetogens and methanogenic Archaea were the dominant microbial communities. Acetogenic bacteria represented by Dendrosporobacter quercicolus-like species formed more than 70% of the population, while methanogenic bacteria related to uncultured Archaea comprising about 10-15% of the microbial community. At an influent lactate to sulfate molar ratio of 2 mol mol(-1), i.e., under sulfate-limiting conditions, a different metabolic route was followed by the mixed anaerobic community. Apparently, lactate was fermented to acetate and propionate, while the majority of sulfidogenesis and methanogenesis were dependent on these fermentation products. This was consistent with the presence of significant levels (40-45% of total bacteria) of D. quercicolus-like heteroacetogens and a corresponding increase of propionate-oxidizing Desulfobulbus-like sulfate-reducing bacteria (20% of the total bacteria). Methanogenic Archaea accounted for 10% of the total microbial community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18305937      PMCID: PMC2271084          DOI: 10.1007/s00253-008-1391-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  26 in total

1.  The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all Bacteria: development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set.

Authors:  H Daims; A Brühl; R Amann; K H Schleifer; M Wagner
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations.

Authors:  R I Amann; B J Binder; R J Olson; S W Chisholm; R Devereux; D A Stahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Bacterial evolution.

Authors:  C R Woese
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1987-06

4.  Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: microbiological aspects.

Authors:  Z Isa; S Grusenmeyer; W Verstraete
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation.

Authors:  R I Amann; W Ludwig; K H Schleifer
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-03

6.  Propionispora vibrioides, nov. gen., nov. sp., a new gram-negative, spore-forming anaerobe that ferments sugar alcohols.

Authors:  H Biebl; H Schwab-Hanisch; C Spröer; H Lünsdorf
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.552

7.  Analysis of diversity and activity of sulfate-reducing bacterial communities in sulfidogenic bioreactors using 16S rRNA and dsrB genes as molecular markers.

Authors:  Shabir A Dar; Li Yao; Udo van Dongen; J Gijs Kuenen; Gerard Muyzer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Phylogenetic relationships of Thiomicrospira species and their identification in deep-sea hydrothermal vent samples by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S rDNA fragments.

Authors:  G Muyzer; A Teske; C O Wirsen; H W Jannasch
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.552

9.  Degradative capacities and 16S rRNA-targeted whole-cell hybridization of sulfate-reducing bacteria in an anaerobic enrichment culture utilizing alkylbenzenes from crude oil.

Authors:  R Rabus; M Fukui; H Wilkes; F Widdle
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Energetics and kinetics of lactate fermentation to acetate and propionate via methylmalonyl-CoA or acrylyl-CoA.

Authors:  Sabine Seeliger; Peter H Janssen; Bernhard Schink
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2002-05-21       Impact factor: 2.742

View more
  29 in total

1.  Deterministic processes guide long-term synchronised population dynamics in replicate anaerobic digesters.

Authors:  Inka Vanwonterghem; Paul D Jensen; Paul G Dennis; Philip Hugenholtz; Korneel Rabaey; Gene W Tyson
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Syntrophic association and performance of Clostridium, Desulfovibrio, Aeromonas and Tetrathiobacter as anodic biocatalysts for bioelectricity generation in dual chamber microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Smita S Kumar; Sandeep K Malyan; Suddhasatwa Basu; Narsi R Bishnoi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Gut Immunity and Type 1 Diabetes: a Mélange of Microbes, Diet, and Host Interactions?

Authors:  David Endesfelder; Marion Engel; Wolfgang Zu Castell
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Impacts of Phragmites australis Invasion on Soil Enzyme Activities and Microbial Abundance of Tidal Marshes.

Authors:  Sunghyun Kim; Jiyoung Kang; J Patrick Megonigal; Hojeong Kang; Jooyoung Seo; Weixin Ding
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Sulfate-reducing bioreactors subjected to high sulfate loading rate or acidity: variations in microbial consortia.

Authors:  Marja Salo; Malin Bomberg
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.126

6.  Assessment of sulfide production risk in soil during the infiltration of domestic wastewater treated by a sulfur-utilizing denitrification process.

Authors:  L Ghorbel; L Coudert; Y Gilbert; G Mercier; J F Blais
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Treatment of acid rock drainage using a sulfate-reducing bioreactor with zero-valent iron.

Authors:  Pedro Ayala-Parra; Reyes Sierra-Alvarez; James A Field
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  The microbiome of Brazilian mangrove sediments as revealed by metagenomics.

Authors:  Fernando Dini Andreote; Diego Javier Jiménez; Diego Chaves; Armando Cavalcante Franco Dias; Danice Mazzer Luvizotto; Francisco Dini-Andreote; Cristiane Cipola Fasanella; Maryeimy Varon Lopez; Sandra Baena; Rodrigo Gouvêa Taketani; Itamar Soares de Melo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Methanogenic archaea and sulfate reducing bacteria co-cultured on acetate: teamwork or coexistence?

Authors:  Derya Ozuolmez; Hyunsoo Na; Mark A Lever; Kasper U Kjeldsen; Bo B Jørgensen; Caroline M Plugge
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Preliminary studies demonstrating acetoclastic methanogenesis in a rat colonic ring model.

Authors:  Edward A Carter; Ronald G Barr
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2013-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.