Literature DB >> 16347019

Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: microbiological aspects.

Z Isa1, S Grusenmeyer, W Verstraete.   

Abstract

In the high-rate anaerobic reactors studied (ca. 10 g of chemical oxygen demand [COD] removed per liter of reactor per day), the sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) were poor competitors of methane-producing bacteria (MPB), scavenging only on the order of 10 to 20% of the total electron flow. The relatively noncompetitive nature of the SRB in this type of reactor is in sharp contrast to the tendency of the SRB to dominate in natural environments and in other types of anaerobic digesters. Various factors such as the feedback inhibition of H(2)S on the SRB, iron limitation, the origin of the SRB inocula, biokinetics, and thermodynamics were investigated. The outcome of the SRB-MPB competition under the reactor conditions studied appeared to be particularly determined by two factors. The SRB, as predicted by the V(max)-K(m) kinetics, competed most effectively at low substrate levels (<0.5 g of COD per liter). The MPB, however, appeared to colonize and adhere much more effectively to the polyurethane carrier matrix present in the reactor, thus compensating for the apparent lower growth rates. Even if the reactor was initially allowed to be predominantly colonized by SRB, the MPB could regain dominance.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 16347019      PMCID: PMC238922          DOI: 10.1128/aem.51.3.580-587.1986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  12 in total

1.  Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: technical aspects.

Authors:  Z Isa; S Grusenmeyer; W Verstraete
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Volatile Fatty acids and hydrogen as substrates for sulfate-reducing bacteria in anaerobic marine sediment.

Authors:  J Sørensen; D Christensen; B B Jørgensen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Sulfate reducers can outcompete methanogens at freshwater sulfate concentrations.

Authors:  D R Lovley; M J Klug
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  R K Thauer; K Jungermann; K Decker
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1977-03

5.  Interrelations between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria in bottom deposits of a fresh-water lake. I. Field observations.

Authors:  T E Cappenberg
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 2.271

6.  Some observations on growth and hydrogen uptake by Desulfovibrio vulgaris.

Authors:  B Khosrovi; R Macpherson; J D Miller
Journal:  Arch Mikrobiol       Date:  1971

7.  Effect of iron on conversion of acetic acid to methane during methanogenic fermentations.

Authors:  D J Hoban; L van den Berg
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1979-08

8.  Inhibition of methanogenesis by sulphate reducing bacteria competing for transferred hydrogen.

Authors:  J W Abram; D B Nedwell
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1978-04-27       Impact factor: 2.552

9.  Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. I. Isolation of new sulfate-reducing bacteria enriched with acetate from saline environments. Description of Desulfobacter postgatei gen. nov., sp. nov.

Authors:  F Widdel; N Pfennig
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.552

10.  Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  18 in total

1.  Distribution of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria in anaerobic aggregates determined by microsensor and molecular analyses.

Authors:  C M Santegoeds; L R Damgaard; G Hesselink; J Zopfi; P Lens; G Muyzer; D de Beer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics.

Authors:  M E Davey; G A O'toole
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: technical aspects.

Authors:  Z Isa; S Grusenmeyer; W Verstraete
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Biofilm Dynamics and Kinetics during High-Rate Sulfate Reduction under Anaerobic Conditions.

Authors:  P H Nielsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens.

Authors:  L Raskin; J M Stromley; B E Rittmann; D A Stahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Environmental factors affecting indole metabolism under anaerobic conditions.

Authors:  E L Madsen; A J Francis; J M Bollag
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Performance of CSTR-EGSB-SBR system for treating sulfate-rich cellulosic ethanol wastewater and microbial community analysis.

Authors:  Lili Shan; Zhaohan Zhang; Yanling Yu; John Justo Ambuchi; Yujie Feng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Effects of sulfate on lactate and C2-, C3- volatile fatty acid anaerobic degradation by a mixed microbial culture.

Authors:  A I Qatibi; A Bories; J L Garcia
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.271

9.  Competition and coexistence of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic populations in anaerobic biofilms.

Authors:  L Raskin; B E Rittmann; D A Stahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Mixed culture hydrogenotrophic nitrate reduction in drinking water.

Authors:  J Liessens; J Vanbrabant; P De Vos; K Kersters; W Verstraete
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.