Literature DB >> 18303568

Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Janek S Lobmaier1, Peter Klaver, Thomas Loenneker, Ernst Martin, Fred W Mast.   

Abstract

We explored the processing mechanisms of featural and configural face information using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. Featural information describes the information contained in the facial parts; configural information conveys the spatial interrelationship between parts. In a delayed matching-to-sample task, participants decided whether an intact test face matched a precedent scrambled or blurred cue face. Scrambled faces primarily contain featural information whereas blurred faces preserve configural information. Scrambled cue faces evoked enhanced activation in the left fusiform gyrus, left parietal lobe, and left lingual gyrus when viewing intact test faces. Following blurred cue faces, test faces enhanced activation bilaterally in the middle temporal gyrus. The results suggest that featural and configural information is processed by following distinct neural pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18303568     DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f556fe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  12 in total

1.  Cognition: Your face looks familiar.

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Adrian Dyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Expressive suppression and neural responsiveness to nonverbal affective cues.

Authors:  Raluca Petrican; R Shayna Rosenbaum; Cheryl Grady
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Neural activity patterns evoked by a spouse's incongruent emotional reactions when recalling marriage-relevant experiences.

Authors:  Raluca Petrican; Rachel Shayna Rosenbaum; Cheryl Grady
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The effect of neurogranin on neural correlates of episodic memory encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  Axel Krug; Sören Krach; Andreas Jansen; Vanessa Nieratschker; Stephanie H Witt; N Jon Shah; Markus M Nöthen; Marcella Rietschel; Tilo Kircher
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Adrian G Dyer; Noha Ferrah; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Progressive and regressive developmental changes in neural substrates for face processing: testing specific predictions of the Interactive Specialization account.

Authors:  Jane E Joseph; Ann D Gathers; Ramesh S Bhatt
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-03

7.  Process and domain specificity in regions engaged for face processing: an fMRI study of perceptual differentiation.

Authors:  Heather R Collins; Xun Zhu; Ramesh S Bhatt; Jonathan D Clark; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Configural and featural processing in humans with congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Janek S Lobmaier; Jens Bölte; Fred W Mast; Christian Dobel
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-07-01

9.  Posterior cortical atrophy: an investigation of scan paths generated during face matching tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin P Meek; Keri Locheed; Jane M Lawrence-Dewar; Paul Shelton; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Congenital prosopagnosia: multistage anatomical and functional deficits in face processing circuitry.

Authors:  V Dinkelacker; M Grüter; P Klaver; T Grüter; K Specht; S Weis; I Kennerknecht; C E Elger; G Fernandez
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.