Literature DB >> 18303093

Dropout rates in randomized clinical trials of antipsychotics: a meta-analysis comparing first- and second-generation drugs and an examination of the role of trial design features.

Jonathan Rabinowitz1, Stephen Z Levine, Orna Barkai, Ori Davidov.   

Abstract

Dropout is often used as an outcome measure in clinical trials of antipsychotic medication. Previous research is inconclusive regarding (a) differences in dropout rates between first- and second-generation antipsychotic medications and (b) how trial design features reduce dropout. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antipsychotic medication was conducted to compare dropout rates for first- and second-generation antipsychotic drugs and to examine how a broad range of design features effect dropout. Ninety-three RCTs that met inclusion criteria were located (n = 26 686). Meta-analytic random effects models showed that dropout was higher for first- than second-generation drugs (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.31-1.66). This advantage persisted after removing study arms with excessively high dosages, in flexible dose studies, studies of patients with symptom exacerbation, nonresponder patients, inpatients, and outpatients. Mixed effects models for meta-analysis were used to identify design features that effected dropout and develop formulae to derive expected dropout rates based on trial design features, and these assigned a pivotal role to duration. Collectively, dropout rates are lower for second- than first-generation antipsychotic drugs and appear to be partly explained by trial design features thus providing direction for future trial design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18303093      PMCID: PMC2696366          DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbn005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  90 in total

1.  A randomized double-blind study of risperidone and olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Authors:  R R Conley; R Mahmoud
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Long-term safety and efficacy of amisulpride in subchronic or chronic schizophrenia. Amisulpride Study Group.

Authors:  L Colonna; P Saleem; L Dondey-Nouvel; W Rein
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.659

Review 3.  Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: systematic overview and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  J Geddes; N Freemantle; P Harrison; P Bebbington
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-02

4.  Amisulpride vs. risperidone in the treatment of acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. Amisulpride study group.

Authors:  J Peuskens; P Bech; H J Möller; R Bale; O Fleurot; W Rein
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1999-11-08       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  A comparison of the effects of quetiapine ('seroquel') and haloperidol in schizophrenic patients with a history of and a demonstrated, partial response to conventional antipsychotic treatment. PRIZE Study Group.

Authors:  R A Emsley; J Raniwalla; P J Bailey; A M Jones
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.659

6.  Retention rates in placebo- and nonplacebo-controlled clinical trials of schizophrenia.

Authors:  A Labelle; L J Boulay; Y D Lapierre
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.356

7.  Neuropsychological change in early phase schizophrenia during 12 months of treatment with olanzapine, risperidone, or haloperidol. The Canadian Collaborative Group for research in schizophrenia.

Authors:  S E Purdon; B D Jones; E Stip; A Labelle; D Addington; S R David; A Breier; G D Tollefson
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-03

8.  Risperidone in the treatment of first-episode psychotic patients: a double-blind multicenter study. Risperidone Working Group.

Authors:  R A Emsley
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Risperidone versus haloperidol in psychotic patients with disturbing neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms: a double-blind, multi-center trial.

Authors:  A H Heck; P M Haffmans; I W de Groot; E Hoencamp
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Amisulpride has a superior benefit/risk profile to haloperidol in schizophrenia: results of a multicentre, double-blind study (the Amisulpride Study Group).

Authors:  P Carrière; D Bonhomme; T Lempérière
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.361

View more
  13 in total

1.  Indirect comparison analysis of efficacy and safety between olanzapine and aripiprazole for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Taro Kunitomi; Masayuki Hashiguchi; Mayumi Mochizuki
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of Dropout Rates in Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trials of Atypical Antipsychotics Assessed by PANSS.

Authors:  Akiko Matsusaki; Masayuki Kaneko; Mamoru Narukawa
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Real-World Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Treatments in a Nationwide Cohort of 29 823 Patients With Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jari Tiihonen; Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz; Maila Majak; Juha Mehtälä; Fabian Hoti; Erik Jedenius; Dana Enkusson; Amy Leval; Jan Sermon; Antti Tanskanen; Heidi Taipale
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 21.596

4.  Disconnection of drug-response and placebo-response in acute-phase antipsychotic drug trials on schizophrenia? Meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Leucht; Anna Chaimani; Dimitris Mavridis; Claudia Leucht; Maximilian Huhn; Bartosz Helfer; Myrto Samara; Andrea Cipriani; John R Geddes; John M Davis
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials.

Authors:  Roderick J Little; Ralph D'Agostino; Michael L Cohen; Kay Dickersin; Scott S Emerson; John T Farrar; Constantine Frangakis; Joseph W Hogan; Geert Molenberghs; Susan A Murphy; James D Neaton; Andrea Rotnitzky; Daniel Scharfstein; Weichung J Shih; Jay P Siegel; Hal Stern
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Human disease biomarker panels through systems biology.

Authors:  Bradley J Smith; Licia C Silva-Costa; Daniel Martins-de-Souza
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2021-10-13

Review 7.  Missing data in randomized controlled trials testing palliative interventions pose a significant risk of bias and loss of power: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Jamilla A Hussain; Ian R White; Dean Langan; Miriam J Johnson; David C Currow; David J Torgerson; Martin Bland
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  A double-blinded randomised dietary supplement crossover trial design to investigate the short-term influence of medium chain fatty acid (MCT) supplement on canine idiopathic epilepsy: study protocol.

Authors:  Benjamin Andreas Berk; Rowena Mary Anne Packer; Tsz Hong Law; Annette Wessmann; Andrea Bathen-Nöthen; Tarja Susanna Jokinen; Anna Knebel; Andrea Tipold; Ludovic Pelligand; Holger Andreas Volk
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Withdrawal reasons of randomized controlled trials on type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shahrzad Mohseni; Ozra Tabatabaei-Malazy; Maryam Peimani; Hanieh-Sadat Ejtahed; Mehrnoosh Khodaeian; Elahe Nazeri; Zahra Nouhi; Kajal Khodamoradi; Maryam Aboeerad; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine versus haloperidol in first-episode schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mostafa Amr; Shaheen E Lakhan; Sarila Sanhan; Dahoud Al-Rhaddad; Moussa Hassan; Mohamed Thiabh; Tarek Shams
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2013-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.