| Literature DB >> 18301764 |
Tapio Mappes1, Minna Koivula, Esa Koskela, Tuula A Oksanen, Tiina Savolainen, Barry Sinervo.
Abstract
Negative frequency-dependence, which favors rare genotypes, promotes the maintenance of genetic variability and is of interest as a potential explanation for genetic differentiation. Density-dependent selection may also promote cyclic changes in frequencies of genotypes. Here we show evidence for both density-dependent and negative frequency-dependent selection on opposite life-history tactics (low or high reproductive effort, RE) in the bank vole (Myodes glareolus). Density-dependent selection was evident among the females with low RE, which were especially favored in low densities. Instead, both negative frequency-dependent and density-dependent selection were shown in females with high RE, which were most successful when they were rare in high densities. Furthermore, selection at the individual level affected the frequencies of tactics at the population level, so that the frequency of the rare high RE tactic increased significantly at high densities. We hypothesize that these two selection mechanisms (density- and negative frequency-dependent selection) may promote genetic variability in cyclic mammal populations. Nevertheless, it remains to be determined whether the origin of genetic variance in life-history traits is causally related to density variation (e.g. population cycles).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18301764 PMCID: PMC2246017 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001687
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The effects of frequency and density on number of offspring weaned, and proportion of offspring surviving until weaning in different tactics of reproductive effort.
| Low reproductive effort | |||||||||
| Number of offspring weaned | Proportion of offspring surviving | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Individual level | Frequency | 1 | 18.2 | 0.19 | 0.669 | 1 | 34.0 | 0.01 | 0.935 |
| Density | 1 | 18.2 | 7.24 | 0.015 | 1 | 34.0 | 11.04 | 0.002 | |
| Freq * Den | 1 | 18.2 | 2.58 | 0.126 | 1 | 34.0 | 2.13 | 0.154 | |
| Population level | Frequency | 1 | 9 | 0.23 | 0.642 | 1 | 9 | 0.01 | 0.919 |
| Density | 1 | 9 | 8.89 | 0.015 | 1 | 9 | 17.72 | 0.002 | |
| Freq * Den | 1 | 9 | 3.17 | 0.109 | 1 | 9 | 3.42 | 0.098 | |
Notes: The analyses of generalized linear mixed models are performed both at the individual level (individual values formed the dependent variables) and at the population level (population means formed the dependent variables). At the individual level, the random effect of population (enclosure) is included in the models (Estimate<0.006, P>0.989 in all cases). df = numerator df, df = denominator df
Survival differences between the high and low RE females and whether the tactic was rare or common in the population.
| Percentage (N) of females surviving to the end of breeding season | |||
| Tactic | Rare | Common | All |
| Low RE | 42.9 (7) | 63.0 (27) | 58.8 (34) |
| High RE | 66.7 (9) | 19.0 (21) | 33.3 (30) |
Notes: The analyses of generalized linear mixed models are performed both at the individual level (individual values formed the dependent variable) and population level (population means formed the dependent variable). At the individual level, the random effect of population (enclosure) is included in the models (Estimate = 0.046, P = 0.339). df = numerator df, df = denominator df
Figure 1Number of offspring weaned of low (a) and high RE females (b) in different densities and frequencies.
Closed circles: rare tactic; Open circles: common tactic in the populations.
Figure 2Density-dependent selection for reproductive effort among rare tactics.
In the analyses of selection gradients, the relative fitness (number of offspring weaned/mean number of offspring weaned in the population) was estimated in relation to standardized reproductive effort ((REi–REmean)/RESD). Selection gradients indicate directional selection towards higher reproductive effort in high densities (closed circles and solid line: β±SE = 0.60±0.15, P = 0.004) but not in low densities (open circles and dashed line: β±SE = −0.08±0.21, P = 0.726) (Standardized RE * Density interaction: F 1,14 = 7.34, P = 0.017). The selection gradient among common tactics was non-significant (β±SE = 0.33±0.44, P = 0.453) and density-independent (Standardized RE * Density interaction: F 1,50 = 0.02, P = 0.904).
Figure 3Change in frequencies of low and high RE tactics in the different treatment populations during the breeding season.
Frequency of high RE tactics increased significantly when densities were high and initial frequency was low (rare tactic), which simultaneously decreased the frequency of low RE (common tactic). Open circles: low RE; Closed circle: high RE. N = number of replicates (populations).
Characteristics (mean±SE) of two female tactics (low or high reproductive effort, RE).
| Source of variance ( | |||||
| Low RE ( | High RE ( | RE tactic | Frequency | Density | |
| Reproductive effort | 0.61±0.02 | 0.88±0.02 | 59.56 | 0.11 ns | 1.91 ns |
| Litter size | 3.82±0.14 | 6.15±0.18 | 76.36 | 0.10 ns | 3.52 ns |
| Mean body mass of offspring (g) | 1.97±0.03 | 1.84±0.02 | 10.60 | 0.02 ns | 2.07 ns |
| Mean head width of offspring (mm) | 8.28±0.05 | 8.09±0.04 | 6.81 | 0.00 ns | 0.07 ns |
| Post-partum body mass of mother (g) | 22.4±0.4 | 24.6±0.4 | 6.87 | 0.01 ns | 0.27 ns |
| Post-partum head width of mother (g) | 13.8±0.07 | 13.8±0.06 | 0.07 ns | 1.34 ns | 0.10 ns |
Random assignment to the different manipulation groups (frequency and density) is tested by three-way ANOVA. All possible two and three-way interactions were non-significant (P>0.11).
P< = 0.001,
P<0.01,
P<0.05
The design of the experiment.
| Low density | Low density total | High density | High density total | Overall total | |
| Rare Low RE + Common High RE | 1+3 (4) | 4+12 | 2+6 ( 2) | 4+12 | |
| Rare High RE + Common Low RE | 1+3 (4) | 4+12 | 2+6 (3) | 6+18 | |
| Total (Low Re+High RE) | 16+16 = 32 | 22+18 = 40 | 32+40 = 72 |
Number of females per enclosure, number of enclosures (in parenthesis) and total number of individuals in each treatment.