Literature DB >> 17017055

The evolution of genetic architecture under frequency-dependent disruptive selection.

Michael Kopp1, Joachim Hermisson.   

Abstract

We propose a model to analyze a quantitative trait under frequency-dependent disruptive selection. Selection on the trait is a combination of stabilizing selection and intraspecific competition, where competition is maximal between individuals with equal phenotypes. In addition, there is a density-dependent component induced by population regulation. The trait is determined additively by a number of biallelic loci, which can have different effects on the trait value. In contrast to most previous models, we assume that the allelic effects at the loci can evolve due to epistatic interactions with the genetic background. Using a modifier approach, we derive analytical results under the assumption of weak selection and constant population size, and we investigate the full model by numerical simulations. We find that frequency-dependent disruptive selection favors the evolution of a highly asymmetric genetic architecture, where most of the genetic variation is concentrated on a small number of loci. We show that the evolution of genetic architecture can be understood in terms of the ecological niches created by competition. The phenotypic distribution of a population with an adapted genetic architecture closely matches this niche structure. Thus, evolution of the genetic architecture seems to be a plausible way for populations to adapt to regimes of frequency-dependent disruptive selection. As such, it should be seen as a potential evolutionary pathway to discrete polymorphisms and as a potential alternative to other evolutionary responses, such as the evolution of sexual dimorphism or assortative mating.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17017055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  27 in total

1.  Evolutionary significance of phenotypic accommodation in novel environments: an empirical test of the Baldwin effect.

Authors:  Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The beak of the other finch: coevolution of genetic covariance structure and developmental modularity during adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Priyanga Amarasekare; Márcio S Araújo; Reinhard Bürger; Jonathan M Levine; Mark Novak; Volker H W Rudolf; Sebastian J Schreiber; Mark C Urban; David A Vasseur
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Sensitivity of quantitative traits to mutational effects and number of loci.

Authors:  Joshua G Schraiber; Michael J Landis
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Mutation load at a mimicry supergene sheds new light on the evolution of inversion polymorphisms.

Authors:  Paul Jay; Mathieu Chouteau; Annabel Whibley; Héloïse Bastide; Hugues Parrinello; Violaine Llaurens; Mathieu Joron
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Frequency dependence limits divergent evolution by favouring rare immigrants over residents.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; William E Stutz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Polyandry and alternative mating tactics.

Authors:  Bryan D Neff; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Intruder colour and light environment jointly determine how nesting male stickleback respond to simulated territorial intrusions.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Kimberly Hendrix; Lyndon Alexander Jordan; Thor Veen; Chad D Brock
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Maintenance of genetic variation in human personality: testing evolutionary models by estimating heritability due to common causal variants and investigating the effect of distant inbreeding.

Authors:  Karin J H Verweij; Jian Yang; Jari Lahti; Juha Veijola; Mirka Hintsanen; Laura Pulkki-Råback; Kati Heinonen; Anneli Pouta; Anu-Katriina Pesonen; Elisabeth Widen; Anja Taanila; Matti Isohanni; Jouko Miettunen; Aarno Palotie; Lars Penke; Susan K Service; Andrew C Heath; Grant W Montgomery; Olli Raitakari; Mika Kähönen; Jorma Viikari; Katri Räikkönen; Johan G Eriksson; Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen; Terho Lehtimäki; Nicholas G Martin; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Peter M Visscher; Matthew C Keller; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 10.  Supergenes and their role in evolution.

Authors:  M J Thompson; C D Jiggins
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.