Literature DB >> 18300245

Discrimination of near-native structures in protein-protein docking by testing the stability of local minima.

Dima Kozakov1, Ora Schueler-Furman, Sandor Vajda.   

Abstract

Fast Fourier transform (FFT) correlation methods of protein-protein docking, combined with the clustering of low energy conformations, can find a number of local minima on the energy surface. For most complexes, the locations of the near-native structures can be constrained to the 30 largest clusters, each surrounding a local minimum. However, no reliable further discrimination can be obtained by energy measures because the differences in the energy levels between the minima are comparable with the errors in the energy evaluation. In fact, no current scoring function accounts for the entropic contributions that relate to the width rather than the depth of the minima. Since structures at narrow minima loose more entropy, some of the nonnative states can be detected by determining whether or not a local minimum is surrounded by a broad region of attraction on the energy surface. The analysis is based on starting Monte Carlo Minimization (MCM) runs from random points around each minimum, and observing whether a certain fraction of trajectories converge to a small region within the cluster. The cluster is considered stable if such a strong attractor exists, has at least 10 convergent trajectories, is relatively close to the original cluster center, and contains a low energy structure. We studied the stability of clusters for enzyme-inhibitor and antibody-antigen complexes in the Protein Docking Benchmark. The analysis yields three main results. First, all clusters that are close to the native structure are stable. Second, restricting considerations to stable clusters eliminates around half of the false positives, that is, solutions that are low in energy but far from the native structure of the complex. Third, dividing the conformational space into clusters and determining the stability of each cluster, the combined approach is less dependent on a priori information than exploring the potential conformational space by Monte Carlo minimizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18300245      PMCID: PMC2823634          DOI: 10.1002/prot.21997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  28 in total

1.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-01

Review 2.  Protein-protein association kinetics and protein docking.

Authors:  Carlos J Camacho; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes.

Authors:  Stephen R Comeau; David W Gatchell; Sandor Vajda; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm.

Authors:  Rong Chen; Li Li; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-07-01

6.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gray; Stewart Moughon; Chu Wang; Ora Schueler-Furman; Brian Kuhlman; Carol A Rohl; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Stochastic roadmap simulation: an efficient representation and algorithm for analyzing molecular motion.

Authors:  Mehmet Serkan Apaydin; Douglas L Brutlag; Carlos Guestrin; David Hsu; Jean-Claude Latombe; Chris Varma
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques.

Authors:  E Katchalski-Katzir; I Shariv; M Eisenstein; A A Friesem; C Aflalo; I A Vakser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Free energy landscapes of encounter complexes in protein-protein association.

Authors:  C J Camacho; Z Weng; S Vajda; C DeLisi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information.

Authors:  H A Gabb; R M Jackson; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-09-12       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  20 in total

1.  How good is automated protein docking?

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; Dmitri Beglov; Tanggis Bohnuud; Scott E Mottarella; Bing Xia; David R Hall; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-10-17

Review 2.  Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 3.  Sampling and scoring: a marriage made in heaven.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; David R Hall; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-08-19

4.  Application of asymmetric statistical potentials to antibody-protein docking.

Authors:  Ryan Brenke; David R Hall; Gwo-Yu Chuang; Stephen R Comeau; Tanggis Bohnuud; Dmitri Beglov; Ora Schueler-Furman; Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Predictive energy landscapes for protein-protein association.

Authors:  Weihua Zheng; Nicholas P Schafer; Aram Davtyan; Garegin A Papoian; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The ClusPro web server for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; David R Hall; Bing Xia; Kathryn A Porter; Dzmitry Padhorny; Christine Yueh; Dmitri Beglov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  Achieving reliability and high accuracy in automated protein docking: ClusPro, PIPER, SDU, and stability analysis in CAPRI rounds 13-19.

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; David R Hall; Dmitri Beglov; Ryan Brenke; Stephen R Comeau; Yang Shen; Keyong Li; Jiefu Zheng; Pirooz Vakili; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-15

8.  New additions to the ClusPro server motivated by CAPRI.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; Christine Yueh; Dmitri Beglov; Tanggis Bohnuud; Scott E Mottarella; Bing Xia; David R Hall; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-01-05

9.  Human and server docking prediction for CAPRI round 30-35 using LZerD with combined scoring functions.

Authors:  Lenna X Peterson; Hyungrae Kim; Juan Esquivel-Rodriguez; Amitava Roy; Xusi Han; Woong-Hee Shin; Jian Zhang; Genki Terashi; Matt Lee; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-10-14

10.  ClusPro in rounds 38 to 45 of CAPRI: Toward combining template-based methods with free docking.

Authors:  Dzmitry Padhorny; Kathryn A Porter; Mikhail Ignatov; Andrey Alekseenko; Dmitri Beglov; Sergei Kotelnikov; Ryota Ashizawa; Israel Desta; Nawsad Alam; Zhuyezi Sun; Emiliano Brini; Ken Dill; Ora Schueler-Furman; Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.