Literature DB >> 18299963

In vivo behaviour of two different biphasic ceramic implanted in mandibular bone of dogs.

Natalia Miño Fariña1, Fernando Muñoz Guzón, Mónica López Peña, Antonio González Cantalapiedra.   

Abstract

Alloplastic calcium phosphate bone substitutes such as hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) have been studied extensively due to their composition closely resembling the inorganic phase of bone tissue. On the same way, by manipulating the HA/TCP ratio it may be possible to change the substitution rate and the bioactivity of these materials, an advantage which has brought them to clinical use in oral and orthopaedic surgery. In this work, we evaluated the histological response in bone of two biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics by varying the proportion of their components. All premolars of 6 beagle dogs were removed from both sides of the mandible. Three months later, four cylinders composed of 85% HA and 15% beta-TCP (BCP 1) were implanted in the right side of mandible and other four cylinders composed of 15% HA and 85% beta-TCP (BCP 2) were implanted in the left side of mandible of dogs for 4, 12 ad 26 weeks, respectively. Two dogs were used in each time point. The histological study indicated that both biphasic ceramic were biocompatible. The earlier and more quantity of bone formed in BCP 2 than in BCP 1 suggested that the first one had a higher osteoinductive potential than the second one in mandibular bone. The resorption of the phosphate phase and the subsequent migration of bone into the resorbed portions were detected in both biphasic ceramics although two processes appeared faster in BCP 2 than in BCP 1. These dates conclude that varying the components of our biphasic ceramic we improve its osteoinductive potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18299963     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-008-3400-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  23 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  S N Khan; E Tomin; J M Lane
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 2.  Bone graft substitutes: past, present, future.

Authors:  S N Parikh
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.476

3.  A comparison of particulate and solid root forms of hydroxylapatite in dog extraction sites.

Authors:  M S Block; J N Kent
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Particles versus solid forms of hydroxyapatite as a treatment modality to preserve residual alveolar ridges.

Authors:  D H Bell
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Calcium and phosphate supplementation promotes bone cell mineralization: implications for hydroxyapatite (HA)-enhanced bone formation.

Authors:  Y L Chang; C M Stanford; J C Keller
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-11

6.  Formation of carbonate-apatite crystals after implantation of calcium phosphate ceramics.

Authors:  G Daculsi; R Z LeGeros; M Heughebaert; I Barbieux
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Histological findings of long-term healing of the experimental defects by application of a synthetic biphasic ceramic in rats.

Authors:  Hakan Develioglu; Serpil Unver Saraydin; Laurent Dupoirieux; Zeynep Deniz Sahin
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  3D microenvironment as essential element for osteoinduction by biomaterials.

Authors:  Pamela Habibovic; Huipin Yuan; Chantal M van der Valk; Gert Meijer; Clemens A van Blitterswijk; Klaas de Groot
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Biphasic calcium phosphate concept applied to artificial bone, implant coating and injectable bone substitute.

Authors:  G Daculsi
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Assessment of the effect of a biphasic ceramic on bone response in a rat calvarial defect model.

Authors:  Hakan Develioğlu; Serpil Unver Saraydin; Giray Bolayir; Laurent Dupoirieux
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 4.396

View more
  8 in total

1.  Assay of in vitro osteoclast activity on dentine, and synthetic calcium phosphate bone substitutes.

Authors:  Zahi Badran; Paul Pilet; Elise Verron; Jean-Michel Bouler; Pierre Weiss; Gaël Grimandi; Jérôme Guicheux; Assem Soueidan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  The association of human primary bone cells with biphasic calcium phosphate (βTCP/HA 70:30) granules increases bone repair.

Authors:  Ronaldo de Oliveira Lomelino; Igor Iuco Castro-Silva; Adriana Brandão Ribeiro Linhares; Gutemberg Gomes Alves; Sílvia Raquel de Albuquerque Santos; Vinicius Schott Gameiro; Alexandre Malta Rossi; José Mauro Granjeiro
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Periodontal regeneration in experimentally-induced alveolar bone dehiscence by an improved porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic in beagle dogs.

Authors:  Han Shi; Jia Ma; Ning Zhao; Yangxi Chen; Yunmao Liao
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Bone formation with two types of grafting materials: a histologic and histomorphometric study.

Authors:  Amir Reza Rokn; Mohammad Amin Khodadoostan; Amir Ali Reza Rasouli Ghahroudi; Puria Motahhary; Mohammad Javad Kharrazi Fard; Hugo De Bruyn; Rose Afzalifar; Ehsan Soolar; Ahmad Soolari
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2011-07-07

5.  Guangxi cobra venom-derived NGF promotes the osteogenic and therapeutic effects of porous BCP ceramic.

Authors:  Pan Jin; Fuqiang Yin; Li Huang; Li Zheng; Jinmin Zhao; Xingdong Zhang
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 8.718

6.  Osteogenic Differentiation of MSC through Calcium Signaling Activation: Transcriptomics and Functional Analysis.

Authors:  Federica Viti; Martina Landini; Alessandra Mezzelani; Loredana Petecchia; Luciano Milanesi; Silvia Scaglione
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BONE NEOFORMATION USING AUTOLOGOUS GRAFTING AND THREE REPLACEMENTS: BONE DEFECTS IN RATS.

Authors:  Rodrigo Steffen Stein; Jefferson Braga Silva; Vinicius Duval da Silva
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-08

8.  Allogenic vs. synthetic granules for bone tissue engineering: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Farnaz Kouhestani; Farnaz Dehabadi; Mehrnoosh Hasan Shahriari; Saeed Reza Motamedian
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2018-07-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.