Literature DB >> 18297652

Proteomics, networks and connectivity indices.

Humberto González-Díaz1, Yenny González-Díaz, Lourdes Santana, Florencio M Ubeira, Eugenio Uriarte.   

Abstract

Describing the connectivity of chemical and/or biological systems using networks is a straight gate for the introduction of mathematical tools in proteomics. Networks, in some cases even very large ones, are simple objects that are composed at least by nodes and edges. The nodes represent the parts of the system and the edges geometric and/or functional relationships between parts. In proteomics, amino acids, proteins, electrophoresis spots, polypeptidic fragments, or more complex objects can play the role of nodes. All of these networks can be numerically described using the so-called Connectivity Indices (CIs). The transformation of graphs (a picture) into CIs (numbers) facilitates the manipulation of information and the search for structure-function relationships in Proteomics. In this work, we review and comment on the challenges and new trends in the definition and applications of CIs in Proteomics. Emphasis is placed on 1-D-CIs for DNA and protein sequences, 2-D-CIs for RNA secondary structures, 3-D-topographic indices (TPGIs) for protein function annotation without alignment, 2-D-CIs and 3-D-TPGIs for the study of drug-protein or drug-RNA quantitative structure-binding relationships, and pseudo 3-D-CIs for protein surface molecular recognition. We also focus on CIs to describe Protein Interaction Networks or RNA co-expression networks. 2-D-CIs for patient blood proteome 2-DE maps or mass spectra are also covered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18297652     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200700638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  41 in total

1.  Applications of graph theory in protein structure identification.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Shenggui Zhang; Fang-Xiang Wu
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Prediction of ketoacyl synthase family using reduced amino acid alphabets.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Pengmian Feng; Hao Lin
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 3.  The application of mass-spectrometry-based protein biomarker discovery to theragnostics.

Authors:  Jonathan M Street; James W Dear
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Interleukin-2-inducible T cell kinase (Itk) network edge dependence for the maturation of iNKT cell.

Authors:  Qian Qi; Mingcan Xia; Yuting Bai; Sanhong Yu; Margherita Cantorna; Avery August
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Prediction of subcellular location of mycobacterial protein using feature selection techniques.

Authors:  Hao Lin; Hui Ding; Feng-Biao Guo; Jian Huang
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.943

6.  Universality in protein residue networks.

Authors:  Ernesto Estrada
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Study of peptide fingerprints of parasite proteins and drug-DNA interactions with Markov-Mean-Energy invariants of biopolymer molecular-dynamic lattice networks.

Authors:  Lázaro Guillermo Pérez-Montoto; María Auxiliadora Dea-Ayuela; Francisco J Prado-Prado; Francisco Bolas-Fernández; Florencio M Ubeira; Humberto González-Díaz
Journal:  Polymer (Guildf)       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Altered retinoic acid metabolism in diabetic mouse kidney identified by O isotopic labeling and 2D mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jonathan M Starkey; Yingxin Zhao; Rovshan G Sadygov; Sigmund J Haidacher; Wanda S Lejeune; Nilay Dey; Bruce A Luxon; Maureen A Kane; Joseph L Napoli; Larry Denner; Ronald G Tilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting drug-target interaction networks based on functional groups and biological features.

Authors:  Zhisong He; Jian Zhang; Xiao-He Shi; Le-Le Hu; Xiangyin Kong; Yu-Dong Cai; Kuo-Chen Chou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Empirical relationship between intra-purine and intra-pyrimidine differences in conserved gene sequences.

Authors:  Ashesh Nandy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.