Literature DB >> 1829763

An evaluation of polishing agents for composite resins.

J W Stoddard1, G H Johnson.   

Abstract

After the gross reduction and fine finishing of a composite resin restoration, selecting a system to create the smoothest polish is difficult because high magnification is necessary to compare the surface roughness. The surfaces of four anterior and posterior composite resins were compared using a Mylar strip, an unfilled resin as a glaze, polishing with three rubber polishers, and three different manufacturers' series of disks. This study suggested that pairing a specific composite resin with a matching polishing system produced the smoothest surface. Because of the differences in the size, shape, number of filler particles, and the type of resin, one system was incapable of creating the smoothest surface for all composite resins.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1829763     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90286-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  13 in total

Review 1.  Review: finishing and polishing procedures of (resin-modified) glass ionomers and compomers in paediatric dentistry.

Authors:  N S Koupis; L A M Marks; R M H Verbeeck; L C Martens
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2007-03

2.  Color change of some aesthetic dental materials: Effect of immersion solutions and finishing of their surfaces.

Authors:  Elizabeth Sarkis
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2012-03-10

3.  The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites.

Authors:  Kusum Bashetty; Sonal Joshi
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-01

4.  Surface roughness of commercial composites after different polishing protocols: an analysis with atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Luca Giacomelli; Giacomo Derchi; Andrea Frustaci; Bruno Orlando; Orlando Bruno; Ugo Covani; Antonio Barone; Daniele De Santis; Francesco Chiappelli
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2010-09-15

Review 5.  A Comparative Analysis of Different Finishing and Polishing Devices on Nanofilled, Microfilled, and Hybrid Composite: A Scanning Electron Microscopy and Profilometric Study.

Authors:  Rishi D Yadav; Deepak Raisingani; Divya Jindal; Rachit Mathur
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2016-09-27

6.  The effects of irradiance and exposure time on the surface roughness of bulk-fill composite resin restorative materials.

Authors:  Fahad I Alkhudhairy
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Influence of Acid, Ethanol, and Anthocyanin Pigment on the Optical and Mechanical Properties of a Nanohybrid Dental Composite Resin.

Authors:  Sukhyun Hwang; Shin Hye Chung; Jung-Tae Lee; Yong-Tae Kim; Yoo Jin Kim; Soram Oh; In-Sung Luke Yeo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Three-dimensional evaluation of surface roughness of resin composites after finishing and polishing.

Authors:  Veena S Nair; Shan Sainudeen; Prabeesh Padmanabhan; L V Vijayashankar; Unu Sujathan; Rajesh Pillai
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

9.  Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites.

Authors:  Brijesh Patel; Naveen Chhabra; Disha Jain
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

10.  Surface Geometry of Four Conventional Nanohybrid Resin-Based Composites and Four Regular Viscosity Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites after Two-Step Polishing Procedure.

Authors:  Mateusz Granat; Janusz Cieloszyk; Urszula Kowalska; Jadwiga Buczkowska-Radlińska; Ryta Łagocka
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.