Literature DB >> 18297434

Autonomic nervous function in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and oral procedures.

Akihiro Mori1, Noritsugu Ohashi, Hideharu Tatebe, Takako Maruyama, Hiroshi Inoue, Shoudou Takegoshi, Toshiharu Kato, Masataka Okuno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) using an ultrathin endoscope is less stressful to the cardiovascular system with less elevation of systolic blood pressure (BP) than oral procedures. To elucidate the mechanism of such beneficial cardiovascular responses, we performed a prospective patient-centered randomized study in which BP and pulse rate (P), as well as autonomic nervous functions, were estimated during transnasal EGD compared with those in oral procedures using the same ultrathin endoscope.
METHODS: The study involved 781 patients, among whom 55 and 56 cases were assigned to transnasal and oral EGD groups, respectively. The autonomic nervous responses were determined employing power spectral analysis (PSA) of heart-rate variations on electrocardiogram. PSA data were based on two peaks in low frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) ranges. HF power and the ratio of LF power/HF power represented parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous activities, respectively.
RESULTS: Our study confirmed the lesser elevation of BP and P in patients undergoing transnasal EGD than in those undergoing oral procedures. PSA revealed a lower increase in LH power/HF power in transnasal EGD than in oral EGD. However, both endoscopic procedures equally suppressed HF power. Significant correlations were found between the parameters of cardiovascular response (P and BP) and autonomic functions (LF power/HF power ratio and HF power).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating less sympathetic stimulation in patients undergoing transnasal EGD, leading to lesser elevation of BP and P.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18297434     DOI: 10.1007/s00535-007-2124-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0944-1174            Impact factor:   7.527


  23 in total

Review 1.  Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a safe and less costly alternative.

Authors:  Kia Saeian
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-06

2.  Transnasal ERCP/ENBD using an ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscope.

Authors:  Akihiro Mori; Takayuki Asano; Takako Maruyama; Noritsugu Ohashi; Hiroshi Inoue; Shodo Takekoshi; Masataka Okuno
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGD.

Authors:  R Dean; K Dua; B Massey; W Berger; W J Hogan; R Shaker
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Vagal stimulation and prevention of sudden death in conscious dogs with a healed myocardial infarction.

Authors:  E Vanoli; G M De Ferrari; M Stramba-Badiale; S S Hull; R D Foreman; P J Schwartz
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Assessment of autonomic nervous activity during gastrointestinal endoscopy: analysis of blood pressure variability by tonometry.

Authors:  T Saijyo; M Nomura; Y Nakaya; K Saito; Y Kondo; M Yukinaka; I Shimizu; S Ito
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.029

6.  Evaluation of autonomic nervous function during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using heart rate variability.

Authors:  T Hayashi; M Nomura; H Honda; K Tezuka; R Torisu; Y Takeuchi; Y Nakaya; S Ito
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Changes in autonomic nervous activity during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a possible factor in cardiac complications.

Authors:  Yoshie Ochi; Masahiro Nomura; Seisuke Okamura; Mitsuyasu Yano; Ken Saito; Yutaka Nakaya; Susumu Ito
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.029

8.  Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Jérôme Dumortier; Bertrand Napoleon; Franck Hedelius; Pierre-Edouard Pellissier; Eric Leprince; Bertrand Pujol; Thierry Ponchon
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Cardiopulmonary risk of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Role of endoscope diameter and systemic sedation.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; C K Wuerker; R M Katon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  J B Arrowsmith; B B Gerstman; D E Fleischer; S B Benjamin
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  16 in total

1.  Transnasal endoscopic retrograde chalangiopancreatography using an ultrathin endoscope: a prospective comparison with a routine oral procedure.

Authors:  Akihiro Mori; Noritsugu Ohashi; Takako Maruyama; Hideharu Tatebe; Katsuhisa Sakai; Takashi Shibuya; Hiroshi Inoue; Shoudou Takegoshi; Masataka Okuno
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Transnasal route: new approach to endoscopy.

Authors:  Sun-Young Lee; Takashi Kawai
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.519

3.  Comparative Assessment of Patient Preferences and Tolerability in Barrett Esophagus Screening: Results From a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Christopher H Blevins; Jason S Egginton; Nilay D Shah; Michele L Johnson; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  Transnasal endoscopy: no gagging no panic!

Authors:  Clare Parker; Estratios Alexandridis; John Plevris; James O'Hara; Simon Panter
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-02

5.  Unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has favorable diagnostic effectiveness, cardiopulmonary safety, and patient satisfaction compared with conventional or sedated endoscopy.

Authors:  Zheng-Lin Ai; Chun-Hui Lan; Li-Lin Fan; Li Lan; Yan Cao; Ping Li; Ou Song; Dong-Feng Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Bile-Duct Stone Removal under Direct Transnasal Cholangioscopy Using an Ultraslim Upper Endoscope.

Authors:  Mi Seon Seo; Jong Ho Moon; Hyun Jong Choi; Hyung Ki Kim; Young Koog Cheon; Young Deok Cho; Moon Sung Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  A pilot study assessing tolerance safety and feasibility of diagnostic transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy using an improved larger caliber endoscope and an adapted topical anesthesia.

Authors:  Valerio Balassone; Mario Dauri; Roberto Cappuccio; Mauro Di Camillo; Domenico Benavoli; Oreste Buonomo; Giuseppe Petrella; Italo Stroppa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Unsedated Transnasal Endoscopy for Preoperative Examination of Bariatric Patients: a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Amaury Teixeira Xavier; Arthur V Alvares; Prasad G Iyer; Vitor N Arantes
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy in elderly and bedridden patients.

Authors:  Mika Yuki; Yuji Amano; Yoshinori Komazawa; Hiroyuki Fukuhara; Toshihiro Shizuku; Shun Yamamoto; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Impaired autonomic function in type 2 diabetic patients during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Akihiro Mori; Takako Maruyama; Noritsugu Ohashi; Takashi Shibuya; Katsuhisa Sakai; Hideharu Tatebe; Hiroshi Inoue; Toshiharu Kato; Masataka Okuno
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08-17       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.