Literature DB >> 18293294

The minimized dead-end elimination criterion and its application to protein redesign in a hybrid scoring and search algorithm for computing partition functions over molecular ensembles.

Ivelin Georgiev1, Ryan H Lilien, Bruce R Donald.   

Abstract

One of the main challenges for protein redesign is the efficient evaluation of a combinatorial number of candidate structures. The modeling of protein flexibility, typically by using a rotamer library of commonly-observed low-energy side-chain conformations, further increases the complexity of the redesign problem. A dominant algorithm for protein redesign is dead-end elimination (DEE), which prunes the majority of candidate conformations by eliminating rigid rotamers that provably are not part of the global minimum energy conformation (GMEC). The identified GMEC consists of rigid rotamers (i.e., rotamers that have not been energy-minimized) and is thus referred to as the rigid-GMEC. As a postprocessing step, the conformations that survive DEE may be energy-minimized. When energy minimization is performed after pruning with DEE, the combined protein design process becomes heuristic, and is no longer provably accurate: a conformation that is pruned using rigid-rotamer energies may subsequently minimize to a lower energy than the rigid-GMEC. That is, the rigid-GMEC and the conformation with the lowest energy among all energy-minimized conformations (the minimized-GMEC) are likely to be different. While the traditional DEE algorithm succeeds in not pruning rotamers that are part of the rigid-GMEC, it makes no guarantees regarding the identification of the minimized-GMEC. In this paper we derive a novel, provable, and efficient DEE-like algorithm, called minimized-DEE (MinDEE), that guarantees that rotamers belonging to the minimized-GMEC will not be pruned, while still pruning a combinatorial number of conformations. We show that MinDEE is useful not only in identifying the minimized-GMEC, but also as a filter in an ensemble-based scoring and search algorithm for protein redesign that exploits energy-minimized conformations. We compare our results both to our previous computational predictions of protein designs and to biological activity assays of predicted protein mutants. Our provable and efficient minimized-DEE algorithm is applicable in protein redesign, protein-ligand binding prediction, and computer-aided drug design. (c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2008.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18293294      PMCID: PMC3263346          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  38 in total

1.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-01

2.  Protein design is NP-hard.

Authors:  Niles A Pierce; Erik Winfree
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2002-10

3.  Structural basis for the activation of phenylalanine in the non-ribosomal biosynthesis of gramicidin S.

Authors:  E Conti; T Stachelhaus; M A Marahiel; P Brick
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-07-16       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Dead-end elimination with backbone flexibility.

Authors:  Ivelin Georgiev; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure. I. Computer-aided modeling of sites with pre-defined geometry.

Authors:  H W Hellinga; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-12-05       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Redesigning the PheA domain of gramicidin synthetase leads to a new understanding of the enzyme's mechanism and selectivity.

Authors:  Brian W Stevens; Ryan H Lilien; Ivelin Georgiev; Bruce R Donald; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes.

Authors:  J W Ponder; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Rational design of peptide antibiotics by targeted replacement of bacterial and fungal domains.

Authors:  T Stachelhaus; A Schneider; M A Marahiel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The minimized dead-end elimination criterion and its application to protein redesign in a hybrid scoring and search algorithm for computing partition functions over molecular ensembles.

Authors:  Ivelin Georgiev; Ryan H Lilien; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 10.  Harnessing the biosynthetic code: combinations, permutations, and mutations.

Authors:  D E Cane; C T Walsh; C Khosla
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  54 in total

1.  Protein loop closure using orientational restraints from NMR data.

Authors:  Chittaranjan Tripathy; Jianyang Zeng; Pei Zhou; Bruce Randall Donald
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  A Bayesian approach for determining protein side-chain rotamer conformations using unassigned NOE data.

Authors:  Jianyang Zeng; Kyle E Roberts; Pei Zhou; Bruce Randall Donald
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Predicting resistance mutations using protein design algorithms.

Authors:  Kathleen M Frey; Ivelin Georgiev; Bruce R Donald; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  BWM*: A Novel, Provable, Ensemble-based Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Sparse Approximations of Computational Protein Design.

Authors:  Jonathan D Jou; Swati Jain; Ivelin S Georgiev; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 5.  Progress in computational protein design.

Authors:  Shaun M Lippow; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 9.740

6.  Computational structure-based redesign of enzyme activity.

Authors:  Cheng-Yu Chen; Ivelin Georgiev; Amy C Anderson; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A HAUSDORFF-BASED NOE ASSIGNMENT ALGORITHM USING PROTEIN BACKBONE DETERMINED FROM RESIDUAL DIPOLAR COUPLINGS AND ROTAMER PATTERNS.

Authors:  Jianyang Michael Zeng; Chittaranjan Tripathy; Pei Zhou; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf       Date:  2008

Review 8.  Designing specific protein-protein interactions using computation, experimental library screening, or integrated methods.

Authors:  T Scott Chen; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 9.  Engineering the acyltransferase substrate specificity of assembly line polyketide synthases.

Authors:  Briana J Dunn; Chaitan Khosla
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  OSPREY: protein design with ensembles, flexibility, and provable algorithms.

Authors:  Pablo Gainza; Kyle E Roberts; Ivelin Georgiev; Ryan H Lilien; Daniel A Keedy; Cheng-Yu Chen; Faisal Reza; Amy C Anderson; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.