BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: White-matter hyperintensities (WMHs) detected by magnetic resonance imaging are thought to represent the effects of cerebral small-vessel disease and neurodegenerative changes. We sought to determine whether the spatial distribution of WMHs discriminates between different disease groups and healthy aging individuals and whether these distributions are related to local cerebral perfusion patterns. METHODS: We examined the pattern of WMHs by T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in 3 groups of subjects: cerebral amyloid angiopathy (n=32), Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment (n=41), and healthy aging (n=29). WMH frequency maps were calculated for each group, and spatial distributions were compared by voxel-wise logistic regression. WMHs were also analyzed as a function of normal cerebral perfusion patterns by overlaying a single photon emission computed tomography atlas. RESULTS: Although WMH volume was greater in cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Alzheimer disease/mild cognitive impairment than in healthy aging, there was no consistent difference in the spatial distributions when controlling for total WMH volume. Hyperintensities were most frequent in the deep periventricular WM in all 3 groups. A strong inverse correlation between hyperintensity frequency and normal perfusion was demonstrated in all groups, demonstrating that WMHs were most common in regions of relatively lower normal cerebral perfusion. CONCLUSIONS: WMHs show a common distribution pattern and predilection for cerebral WM regions with lower atlas-derived perfusion, regardless of the underlying diagnosis. These data suggest that across diverse disease processes, WM injury may occur in a pattern that reflects underlying tissue properties, such as relative perfusion.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: White-matter hyperintensities (WMHs) detected by magnetic resonance imaging are thought to represent the effects of cerebral small-vessel disease and neurodegenerative changes. We sought to determine whether the spatial distribution of WMHs discriminates between different disease groups and healthy aging individuals and whether these distributions are related to local cerebral perfusion patterns. METHODS: We examined the pattern of WMHs by T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in 3 groups of subjects: cerebral amyloid angiopathy (n=32), Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment (n=41), and healthy aging (n=29). WMH frequency maps were calculated for each group, and spatial distributions were compared by voxel-wise logistic regression. WMHs were also analyzed as a function of normal cerebral perfusion patterns by overlaying a single photon emission computed tomography atlas. RESULTS: Although WMH volume was greater in cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Alzheimer disease/mild cognitive impairment than in healthy aging, there was no consistent difference in the spatial distributions when controlling for total WMH volume. Hyperintensities were most frequent in the deep periventricular WM in all 3 groups. A strong inverse correlation between hyperintensity frequency and normal perfusion was demonstrated in all groups, demonstrating that WMHs were most common in regions of relatively lower normal cerebral perfusion. CONCLUSIONS: WMHs show a common distribution pattern and predilection for cerebral WM regions with lower atlas-derived perfusion, regardless of the underlying diagnosis. These data suggest that across diverse disease processes, WM injury may occur in a pattern that reflects underlying tissue properties, such as relative perfusion.
Authors: M Yoshita; E Fletcher; D Harvey; M Ortega; O Martinez; D M Mungas; B R Reed; C S DeCarli Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-12-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M O'Sullivan; D J Lythgoe; A C Pereira; P E Summers; J M Jarosz; S C R Williams; H S Markus Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-08-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Adam M Brickman; Christiane Reitz; José A Luchsinger; Jennifer J Manly; Nicole Schupf; Jordan Muraskin; Charles DeCarli; Truman R Brown; Richard Mayeux Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2010-05
Authors: E E Smith; D H Salat; J Jeng; C R McCreary; B Fischl; J D Schmahmann; B C Dickerson; A Viswanathan; M S Albert; D Blacker; S M Greenberg Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Dorothy B Wakefield; Nicola Moscufo; Charles R Guttmann; George A Kuchel; Richard F Kaplan; Godfrey Pearlson; Leslie Wolfson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-01-26 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Stefano Peca; Cheryl R McCreary; Emily Donaldson; Gopukumar Kumarpillai; Nandavar Shobha; Karla Sanchez; Anna Charlton; Craig D Steinback; Andrew E Beaudin; Daniela Flück; Neelan Pillay; Gordon H Fick; Marc J Poulin; Richard Frayne; Bradley G Goodyear; Eric E Smith Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Lidia Sarro; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Christopher G Schwarz; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Scott A Przybelski; Timothy G Lesnick; Samantha M Zuk; Robert I Reid; Mekala R Raman; Bradley F Boeve; Tanis J Ferman; David S Knopman; Giancarlo Comi; Massimo Filippi; Melissa E Murray; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; Kejal Kantarci Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Robert J Dawe; Lei Yu; Julie A Schneider; Konstantinos Arfanakis; David A Bennett; Patricia A Boyle Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: M Edip Gurol; Anand Viswanathan; Christopher Gidicsin; Trey Hedden; Sergi Martinez-Ramirez; Andrew Dumas; Anastasia Vashkevich; Alison M Ayres; Eitan Auriel; Ellis van Etten; Alex Becker; Jeremy Carmasin; Kristin Schwab; Jonathan Rosand; Keith A Johnson; Steven M Greenberg Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: C J Aine; J E Bryant; J E Knoefel; J C Adair; B Hart; C H Donahue; R Montaño; R Hayek; C Qualls; D Ranken; J M Stephen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 6.556