Literature DB >> 1829079

A review of the safety profile of teicoplanin.

P G Davey1, A H Williams.   

Abstract

Safety of teicoplanin has been assessed in 3377 patients treated in Europe up to the end of June 1990. One or more adverse events were experienced by 10% of patients. Age and teicoplanin dose had no significant effect on the incidence or type of adverse event. In comparative trials the incidence and profile of adverse events to teicoplanin have been similar to those seen with beta-lactam therapy. Impaired renal function occurred consistently more frequently with vancomycin therapy than with teicoplanin therapy, particularly when these drugs were co-administered with aminoglycosides. Severe skin reactions have not been reported with teicoplanin, which, unlike vancomycin, does not cause infusion rate-related release of histamine. These data provide further evidence that teicoplanin is safer than vancomycin and does not have dose-related adverse effects in the dose range 3-10 mg/kg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1829079     DOI: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_b.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  17 in total

1.  Teicoplanin induced drug hypersensitivity syndrome.

Authors:  C M Perrett; S R McBride
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-29

Review 2.  Teicoplanin. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of gram-positive infections.

Authors:  C M Spencer; H M Bryson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Comparative Study of Teicoplanin vs Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia.

Authors:  C Y Liu; W S Lee; C P Fung; N C Cheng; C L Liu; S P Yang; S L Chen
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  A risk-benefit assessment of teicoplanin in the treatment of infections.

Authors:  F de Lalla; A Tramarin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Neurological and Psychiatric Adverse Effects of Antimicrobials.

Authors:  Madison K Bangert; Rodrigo Hasbun
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  Evaluating the optimal dose of teicoplanin with therapeutic drug monitoring: not too high for adverse event, not too low for treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Si-Ho Kim; Cheol-In Kang; Kyungmin Huh; Sun Young Cho; Doo Ryeon Chung; Soo-Youn Lee; Yae-Jean Kim; Kyong Ran Peck
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Glycopeptides and nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  A W Chow; R M Azar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Teicoplanin: 10 years of clinical experience.

Authors:  M Trautmann; H Wiedeck; M Ruhnke; M Oethinger; R Marre
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 9.  Anti-infective treatment in intensive care: the role of glycopeptides.

Authors:  R N Grüneberg; A P Wilson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  [Febrile neutropenia: practical aspects].

Authors:  P Harten; B Seyfarth; N Schmitz
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.