Literature DB >> 18288692

Spatial patterning of cholinergic amacrine cells in the mouse retina.

Irene E Whitney1, Patrick W Keeley, Mary A Raven, Benjamin E Reese.   

Abstract

The two populations of cholinergic amacrine cells in the inner nuclear layer (INL) and the ganglion cell layer (GCL) differ in their spatial organization in the mouse retina, but the basis for this difference is not understood. The present investigation examined this issue in six strains of mice that differ in their number of cholinergic cells, addressing how the regularity, packing, and spacing of these cells varies as a function of strain, layer, and density. The number of cholinergic cells was lower in the GCL than in the INL in all six strains. The nearest neighbor and Voronoi domain regularity indexes as well as the packing factor were each consistently lower for the GCL. While these regularity indexes and the packing factor were largely stable across variation in density, the effective radius was inversely related to density for both the GCL and INL, being smaller and more variable in the GCL. Consequently, despite the lower densities in the GCL, neighboring cells were more likely to be positioned closer to one another than in the higher-density INL, thereby reducing regularity and packing. This difference in the spatial organization of cholinergic cells may be due to the cells in the GCL having been passively displaced by fascicles of optic axons and an expanding retinal vasculature during development. In support of this interpretation, we show such displacement of cholinergic somata relative to their dendritic stalks and a decline in packing efficiency and regularity during postnatal development that is more severe for the GCL. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18288692      PMCID: PMC2414441          DOI: 10.1002/cne.21630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  35 in total

1.  The density recovery profile: a method for the analysis of points in the plane applicable to retinal studies.

Authors:  R W Rodieck
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Spatial properties of retinal mosaics: an empirical evaluation of some existing measures.

Authors:  J E Cook
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Mosaics of islet-1-expressing amacrine cells assembled by short-range cellular interactions.

Authors:  L Galli-Resta; G Resta; S S Tan; B E Reese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The development of astrocytes in the cat retina: evidence of migration from the optic nerve.

Authors:  T L Ling; J Stone
Journal:  Brain Res Dev Brain Res       Date:  1988-11-01

5.  Retinal astrocytes are immigrants from the optic nerve.

Authors:  T Watanabe; M C Raff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-04-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Cellular retinaldehyde binding protein in developing retinal astrocytes.

Authors:  P T Johnson; S F Geller; G P Lewis; B E Reese
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  The shape and distribution of astrocytes in the retina of the adult rabbit.

Authors:  J Schnitzer; A Karschin
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  In vivo staining of oligodendroglia in the rabbit retina.

Authors:  B Ehinger; C L Zucker; A Bruun; A Adolph
Journal:  Glia       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.452

9.  Monoclonal antibodies specific for glial fibrillary acidic (GFA) protein and for each of the neurofilament triplet polypeptides.

Authors:  E Debus; K Weber; M Osborn
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.880

10.  Overexpression of BCL-2 in transgenic mice protects neurons from naturally occurring cell death and experimental ischemia.

Authors:  J C Martinou; M Dubois-Dauphin; J K Staple; I Rodriguez; H Frankowski; M Missotten; P Albertini; D Talabot; S Catsicas; C Pietra
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  33 in total

1.  beta-Endorphin expression in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Shannon K Gallagher; Paul Witkovsky; Michel J Roux; Malcolm J Low; Veronica Otero-Corchon; Shane T Hentges; Jozsef Vigh
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 2.  Development of the retina and optic pathway.

Authors:  Benjamin E Reese
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Brn3a and Brn3b knockout mice display unvaried retinal fine structure despite major morphological and numerical alterations of ganglion cells.

Authors:  Miruna Georgiana Ghinia; Elena Novelli; Szilard Sajgo; Tudor Constantin Badea; Enrica Strettoi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Development of ON and OFF cholinergic amacrine cells in the human fetal retina.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Wan-Qing Yu; Akina Hoshino; Jing Huang; Fred Rieke; Thomas A Reh; Rachel O L Wong
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-02-25       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Beta-amyloid deposition and functional impairment in the retina of the APPswe/PS1DeltaE9 transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sylvia E Perez; Stephen Lumayag; Beatrix Kovacs; Elliott J Mufson; Shunbin Xu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 6.  Genomic control of neuronal demographics in the retina.

Authors:  Benjamin E Reese; Patrick W Keeley
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 21.198

7.  Random spatial patterning of cone bipolar cell mosaics in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Patrick W Keeley; Jason J Kim; Sammy C S Lee; Silke Haverkamp; Benjamin E Reese
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  The somal patterning of the AII amacrine cell mosaic in the mouse retina is indistinguishable from random simulations matched for density and constrained by soma size.

Authors:  Patrick W Keeley; Benjamin E Reese
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Interrelationships between Cellular Density, Mosaic Patterning, and Dendritic Coverage of VGluT3 Amacrine Cells.

Authors:  Patrick W Keeley; Mikayla C Lebo; Jordan D Vieler; Jason J Kim; Ace J St John; Benjamin E Reese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Differential response of C57BL/6J mouse and DBA/2J mouse to optic nerve crush.

Authors:  Justin P Templeton; Mohamed Nassr; Felix Vazquez-Chona; Natalie E Freeman-Anderson; William E Orr; Robert W Williams; Eldon E Geisert
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.