Literature DB >> 18287292

A comparative study of three different PCR assays for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium in urogenital specimens from men and women.

Andreas Edberg1, Margaretha Jurstrand2, Eva Johansson3, Elisabeth Wikander1, Anna Höög1, Thomas Ahlqvist1, Lars Falk4,5, Jørgen Skov Jensen6, Hans Fredlund2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare conventional 16S rRNA gene PCR, real-time 16S rRNA gene PCR and real-time Mycoplasma genitalium adhesin protein (MgPa) gene PCR as detection methods for M. genitalium infection. The study also determined the prevalence of M. genitalium in male and female patients attending a sexually transmitted infections clinic in a rural area in the west of Sweden. First void urine (FVU) and/or urethral swabs were collected from 381 men, and FVU and/or cervical swabs and/or urethral swabs were collected from 298 women. A total of 213 specimens were used in the PCR comparative study: 98 consecutively sampled specimens from patients enrolled in the prevalence study, 36 consecutively sampled specimens from patients with symptoms of urethritis and 79 specimens from patients positive for M. genitalium by real-time MgPa gene PCR in the prevalence study. A true-positive M. genitalium DNA specimen was defined as either a specimen positive in any two PCR assays or a specimen whose PCR product was verified by DNA sequencing. The prevalence of M. genitalium infection in men and women was 27/381 (7.1 %) and 23/298 (7.7 %), respectively. In the PCR comparative study, M. genitalium DNA was detected in 61/76 (80.3 %) of true-positive specimens by conventional 16S rRNA gene PCR, in 52/76 (68.4 %) by real-time 16S rRNA gene PCR and in 74/76 (97.4 %) by real-time MgPa gene PCR. Real-time MgPa gene PCR thus had higher sensitivity compared with conventional 16S rRNA gene PCR and had considerably increased sensitivity compared with real-time 16S rRNA gene PCR for detection of M. genitalium DNA. Real-time MgPa gene PCR is well suited for the clinical diagnosis of M. genitalium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18287292     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47498-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of two Mycoplasma genitalium real-time PCR detection methodologies.

Authors:  Jimmy Twin; Nicole Taylor; Suzanne M Garland; Jane S Hocking; Jennifer Walker; Catriona S Bradshaw; Christopher K Fairley; Sepehr N Tabrizi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Mycoplasma genitalium and preterm delivery at an urban community health center.

Authors:  Sarah H Averbach; Michele R Hacker; Timothy Yiu; Anna Merport Modest; Jordan Dimitrakoff; Hope A Ricciotti
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  Evaluation of the Hologic Panther Transcription-Mediated Amplification Assay for Detection of Mycoplasma genitalium.

Authors:  S N Tabrizi; A M Costa; J Su; P Lowe; C S Bradshaw; C K Fairley; S M Garland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Antimicrobial Resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates from High-Risk Men in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Authors:  Liteboho D Maduna; Marleen M Kock; Brian M J W van der Veer; Oscar Radebe; James McIntyre; Lieke B van Alphen; Remco P H Peters
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Mycoplasma genitalium in Toronto, Ont: Estimates of prevalence and macrolide resistance.

Authors:  Dionne Gesink; C Sarai Racey; Christine Seah; Sandra Zittermann; Leo Mitterni; Jerry Juzkiw; Heather Jamieson; Jane Greer; Sudesh Singh; Jørgen Skov Jensen; Vanessa Allen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Tools for detection of Mycoplasma amphoriforme: a primary respiratory pathogen?

Authors:  Clare L Ling; Katarina Oravcova; Thomas F Beattie; Dean D Creer; Paul Dilworth; Naomi L Fulton; Alison Hardie; Michelle Munro; Marcus Pond; Kate Templeton; David Webster; Sarita Workman; Timothy D McHugh; Stephen H Gillespie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Risk factors for Mycoplasma genitalium infection among female sex workers: a cross-sectional study in two cities in southwest China.

Authors:  Zhi Xiang; Yue-Ping Yin; Mei-Qin Shi; Ning Jiang; Yan Han; Hong-Chun Wang; Bing-Jie Zheng; Guo-Jun Liang; Xiang-Sheng Chen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  'The difference in determinants of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium in a sample of young Australian women'.

Authors:  Jennifer Walker; Christopher K Fairley; Catriona S Bradshaw; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Marcus Y Chen; Jimmy Twin; Nicole Taylor; Basil Donovan; John K Kaldor; Kathleen McNamee; Eve Urban; Sandra Walker; Marian Currie; Hudson Birden; Francis Bowden; Jane Gunn; Marie Pirotta; Lyle Gurrin; Veerakathy Harindra; Suzanne Garland; Jane S Hocking
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Persistent exposure to Mycoplasma induces malignant transformation of human prostate cells.

Authors:  Kazunori Namiki; Steve Goodison; Stacy Porvasnik; Robert W Allan; Kenneth A Iczkowski; Cydney Urbanek; Leticia Reyes; Noboru Sakamoto; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Mycoplasma genitalium: an emerging sexually transmitted pathogen.

Authors:  Sunil Sethi; Gagandeep Singh; Palash Samanta; Meera Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.