OBJECTIVES: We present an overview of the literature between 1997 and 2007 on parental stress reactions following the diagnosis of childhood cancer and we evaluate methodological strengths and weaknesses of the studies. METHODS: PubMed, PsychInfo, and Cinahl databases were used. Sixty-seven were included in the review. RESULTS: The conceptualization of parental stress and timing of assessment varies considerably between the studies, which makes comparison difficult. Most emotional stress reactions are seen around the time of diagnosis, with mothers reporting more symptoms than fathers. As a group, parents seem relatively resilient, although a subset of parents reports continuing stress even up to 5 years or more postdiagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The authors recommend clear definitions of parental stress, fixed points in time to assess parental stress, and an approach that highlights both parental strengths and weaknesses. Improved assessment can contribute to tailoring psychological care to those parents most in need.
OBJECTIVES: We present an overview of the literature between 1997 and 2007 on parental stress reactions following the diagnosis of childhood cancer and we evaluate methodological strengths and weaknesses of the studies. METHODS: PubMed, PsychInfo, and Cinahl databases were used. Sixty-seven were included in the review. RESULTS: The conceptualization of parental stress and timing of assessment varies considerably between the studies, which makes comparison difficult. Most emotional stress reactions are seen around the time of diagnosis, with mothers reporting more symptoms than fathers. As a group, parents seem relatively resilient, although a subset of parents reports continuing stress even up to 5 years or more postdiagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The authors recommend clear definitions of parental stress, fixed points in time to assess parental stress, and an approach that highlights both parental strengths and weaknesses. Improved assessment can contribute to tailoring psychological care to those parents most in need.
Authors: Madeleine J Dunn; Erin M Rodriguez; Anna S Barnwell; Julie C Grossenbacher; Kathryn Vannatta; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Bruce E Compas Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Susan M Sawyer; Robyn McNeil; Maria McCarthy; Lisa Orme; Kate Thompson; Sarah Drew; David Dunt Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: C M J Vrijmoet-Wiersma; R M Egeler; H M Koopman; A Lindahl Norberg; M A Grootenhuis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-07-02 Impact factor: 3.603