Literature DB >> 18286487

Lateral oromandibular defect: when is it appropriate to use a bridging reconstruction plate combined with a soft tissue revascularized flap?

Douglas B Chepeha1, Theodoros N Teknos, Kevin Fung, Josef Shargorodsky, Assuntina G Sacco, Brian Nussenbaum, Lamont Jones, Avraham Eisbruch, Carol R Bradford, Mark E Prince, Jeffrey S Moyer, Julia S Lee, Gregory T Wolf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A quasi-experimental retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate a new concept of free tissue volume restoration combined with bridging reconstruction plate (compartment approach) to reduce plate-related complication rates.
METHODS: We evaluated 40 patients with large lateral mandible defects and associated complex soft tissue defects reconstructed with a revascularized soft tissue flap and titanium hollow screw reconstruction plates. A case-control comparison was performed based on reconstruction type: restoration of soft tissue defect (conventional approach-group 1) versus over-reconstruction of soft tissue defect (compartment approach-group 2).
RESULTS: Plate exposure rate was 6 of 16 (38%) in group 1 versus 2 of 24 (8%) in group 2, and the difference was statistically significant (p = .04). The mean time to exposure was 10 months. Plate fracture rate was 6 of 23 (26.1%) in dentulous patients versus 1 of 17 (5.9%) in edentulous patients. Gastrostomy tube dependence was 6 of 16 (38%) in group 1 versus 6 of 24 (25%) in group 2.
CONCLUSION: The "compartment approach" reduces plate exposure rate and gastrostomy tube dependence. Revascularized osseocutaneous reconstruction is still required in dentulous patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18286487     DOI: 10.1002/hed.20776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Mechanical Stability between Fibular Free Flap Reconstruction versus Locking Mandibular Reconstruction Plate Fixation.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Chung; Eul-Sik Yoon; Seung-Ha Park; Byung-Il Lee; Hyon-Surk Kim; Hi-Jin You
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-14

2.  Reconstruction plates used in the surgery for mandibular discontinuity defect.

Authors:  Guk-Jin Seol; Eun-Gyu Jeon; Jong-Sung Lee; So-Young Choi; Jin-Wook Kim; Tae-Geon Kwon; Jun-Young Paeng
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-26

Review 3.  Head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Prabha Yadav
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05

4.  Surgical site infections following oral cavity cancer resection and reconstruction is a risk factor for plate exposure.

Authors:  Christopher M Yao; Hedyeh Ziai; Gordon Tsang; Andrea Copeland; Dale Brown; Jonathan C Irish; Ralph W Gilbert; David P Goldstein; Patrick J Gullane; John R de Almeida
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-04-08

Review 5.  Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects: Current procedures and perspectives.

Authors:  Arnaud Paré; Adeline Bossard; Boris Laure; Pierre Weiss; Olivier Gauthier; Pierre Corre
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.