Yair Lotan1, Shahrokh F Shariat. 1. Department of Urology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. yair.lotan@utsouthwestern.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of different risk factors and symptoms on the performance characteristics of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) BladderChek test (Matritech Inc., Newton, MA, USA) for the detection of bladder cancer, as this is a point-of-care assay that measures NMPs in voided urine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 23 academic, private practice and veterans' facilities in 10 states prospectively enrolled consecutive patients from September 2001 to May 2002. Participants included 1328 patients at elevated risk of bladder cancer from factors such as a history of smoking or symptoms including haematuria and/or dysuria. Patients at risk of malignancy of the urinary tract provided a voided urine sample for analysis of NMP22 protein and cytology before cystoscopy. RESULTS: Of the 1328 patients: no urinary disease, benign disease and malignancy were found in 545 (41%), 704 (53%) and 79 (6%) patients, respectively. Overall, the positive predictive value (PPV) for detection of bladder cancer was 20.3% (45/222) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 96.9% (1072/1106). The PPV was higher in men (24.0%) than women (13.2%). In men, the PPV increased with smoking (35.4%), gross haematuria (51.2%) and a combination of both factors (70.6%). The impact on the PPV of smoking (9.7%) and gross haematuria (28.6%) was less dramatic in women. The PPV increased from 16.8% in patients aged <65 years to 23.5% in those aged >65 years. The NPV remained almost always >95% except in men with gross haematuria where it decreased to 77% in smokers and 94% in non-smokers. CONCLUSION: The PPV of the BladderChek test improves in patients at higher risk of bladder cancer reaching 77% in men presenting with gross haematuria who are aged >65 years and smoke. The NPV is highest in women aged <65 years, up to 100%.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of different risk factors and symptoms on the performance characteristics of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) BladderChek test (Matritech Inc., Newton, MA, USA) for the detection of bladder cancer, as this is a point-of-care assay that measures NMPs in voided urine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 23 academic, private practice and veterans' facilities in 10 states prospectively enrolled consecutive patients from September 2001 to May 2002. Participants included 1328 patients at elevated risk of bladder cancer from factors such as a history of smoking or symptoms including haematuria and/or dysuria. Patients at risk of malignancy of the urinary tract provided a voided urine sample for analysis of NMP22 protein and cytology before cystoscopy. RESULTS: Of the 1328 patients: no urinary disease, benign disease and malignancy were found in 545 (41%), 704 (53%) and 79 (6%) patients, respectively. Overall, the positive predictive value (PPV) for detection of bladder cancer was 20.3% (45/222) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 96.9% (1072/1106). The PPV was higher in men (24.0%) than women (13.2%). In men, the PPV increased with smoking (35.4%), gross haematuria (51.2%) and a combination of both factors (70.6%). The impact on the PPV of smoking (9.7%) and gross haematuria (28.6%) was less dramatic in women. The PPV increased from 16.8% in patients aged <65 years to 23.5% in those aged >65 years. The NPV remained almost always >95% except in men with gross haematuria where it decreased to 77% in smokers and 94% in non-smokers. CONCLUSION: The PPV of the BladderChek test improves in patients at higher risk of bladder cancer reaching 77% in men presenting with gross haematuria who are aged >65 years and smoke. The NPV is highest in women aged <65 years, up to 100%.
Authors: Beate Pesch; Dirk Taeger; Georg Johnen; Katarzyna Gawrych; Nadine Bonberg; Christian Schwentner; Harald Wellhäusser; Matthias Kluckert; Gabriele Leng; Michael Nasterlack; Yair Lotan; Arnulf Stenzl; Thomas Brüning Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Susanne Deininger; J Hennenlotter; S Rausch; K Docktor; E Neumann; I A da Costa; J Bedke; A Stenzl; T Todenhöfer Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Shahrokh F Shariat; Caroline Savage; Thomas F Chromecki; Maxine Sun; Douglas S Scherr; Richard K Lee; Giovanni Lughezzani; Mesut Remzi; Michael J Marberger; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Andrew J Vickers Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Peter Black; Girish Kulkarni; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Tarik Alam; Fadi Brimo; Normand Blais; Chris Booth; Joseph Chin; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Michael Jewett; Ron Moore; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad; D Robert Siemens Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: John D Kelly; Tim J Dudderidge; Alex Wollenschlaeger; Odu Okoturo; Keith Burling; Fiona Tulloch; Ian Halsall; Teresa Prevost; Andrew Toby Prevost; Joana C Vasconcelos; Wendy Robson; Hing Y Leung; Nikhil Vasdev; Robert S Pickard; Gareth H Williams; Kai Stoeber Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 3.240