OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of e-mail communication between surgeon and patient prior to elective surgery. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred consecutive patients presenting for consultation prior to undergoing thyroid or parathyroid surgery. INTERVENTION: All were randomized to either receiving an information sheet promoting e-mail communication as the preferred method of communication (group E) or a standard information sheet (group S). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Use of communication with the surgeon outside of the booked preoperative and postoperative consultation and (2) satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 26 of 100 patients (26%) initiated additional perioperative communication with the surgeon, 19 of 50 (38%) in group E and 7 of 50 (14%) in group S (P < .001). Of those who initiated communication, 22 of 26 (84%) did so by e-mail; 3 (12%), by fax; and 1 (4%), by telephone. For patients using e-mail, 18 of 22 (81%) were in group E and 4 of 22 (18%), in group S (P < .02). Overall, 34 e-mails were sent by 22 patients in the study group. Most e-mails sent focused on only 1 issue; however, some patients raised multiple issues, with the most being 4 issues in a single e-mail. There were no differences in any of the outcome measures in relation to patient satisfaction with communication. CONCLUSION: Despite concerns about potential medicolegal issues and other disadvantages, providing patients undergoing elective surgery with e-mail access to their surgeon results in improved levels of communication without any demonstrated impairment of satisfaction with outcomes.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of e-mail communication between surgeon and patient prior to elective surgery. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred consecutive patients presenting for consultation prior to undergoing thyroid or parathyroid surgery. INTERVENTION: All were randomized to either receiving an information sheet promoting e-mail communication as the preferred method of communication (group E) or a standard information sheet (group S). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Use of communication with the surgeon outside of the booked preoperative and postoperative consultation and (2) satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 26 of 100 patients (26%) initiated additional perioperative communication with the surgeon, 19 of 50 (38%) in group E and 7 of 50 (14%) in group S (P < .001). Of those who initiated communication, 22 of 26 (84%) did so by e-mail; 3 (12%), by fax; and 1 (4%), by telephone. For patients using e-mail, 18 of 22 (81%) were in group E and 4 of 22 (18%), in group S (P < .02). Overall, 34 e-mails were sent by 22 patients in the study group. Most e-mails sent focused on only 1 issue; however, some patients raised multiple issues, with the most being 4 issues in a single e-mail. There were no differences in any of the outcome measures in relation to patient satisfaction with communication. CONCLUSION: Despite concerns about potential medicolegal issues and other disadvantages, providing patients undergoing elective surgery with e-mail access to their surgeon results in improved levels of communication without any demonstrated impairment of satisfaction with outcomes.
Authors: Jared A Shenson; Robert M Cronin; Sharon E Davis; Qingxia Chen; Gretchen Purcell Jackson Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Grant R Martsolf; Jeffrey A Alexander; Yunfeng Shi; Lawrence P Casalino; Diane R Rittenhouse; Dennis P Scanlon; Stephen M Shortell Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Michael E Chua; Megan A Saunders; Paul R Bowlin; Jessica M Ming; Roberto Iglesias Lopes; Walid A Farhat; Joana Dos Santos Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Hardeep Singh; Sarah A Fox; Nancy J Petersen; Anila Shethia; Richard L Street Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 5.428