Literature DB >> 18282617

The use of unprocessed urine samples for detecting and monitoring BK viruses in renal transplant recipients by a quantitative real-time PCR assay.

Xiaoli L Pang1, Kimberly Martin, Jutta K Preiksaitis.   

Abstract

Results of quantitative BK viral load using real-time quantitative PCR (rt-QPCR) were compared using two types of samples, extracted urine DNA and unprocessed urine. An excellent correlation was observed in quantitative viral load between unprocessed urine and extracted urine DNA samples. (R2=0.96, p<0.001). Compared to extracted urine DNA when a small sample volume of unprocessed urine was used (2 microl per PCR reaction), 100% concordance is detection of BKV DNA was observed in 124 samples (106 positive and 18 negative) collected from renal transplant recipient (RTR). There was no significant difference in the quantitative BK viral load (log10 copies/ml) detected in extracted urine DNA (median=7.82) compared to unprocessed urine (median=7.17). Urine pH in the range of 5.2-7.1 and specimen freezing had no effect on the rt-QPCR reaction. The partial inhibition of the rt-QPCR reaction observed when 5 microl sample volume of unprocessed urine was used was markedly reduced at a sample volume of 2 microl. Using unprocessed urine for rt-QPCR detection of BK viral load is cost-saving while maintaining the sensitivity and accuracy associated with the use of extracted urine DNA, making a clinical BKV surveillance strategy in RTR based on urinary sample screening using rt-QPCR as the first line test more feasible.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18282617     DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2007.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


  3 in total

Review 1.  BK polyomavirus infection and nephropathy: the virus-immune system interplay.

Authors:  Nina Babel; Hans-Dieter Volk; Petra Reinke
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Optimized amplification of BK polyomavirus in urine.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Odegard; Heidi L Meeds; Steven B Kleiboeker; Assem Ziady; Anthony Sabulski; Sonata Jodele; Alix E Seif; Stella M Davies; Benjamin L Laskin; Jason T Blackard
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.014

3.  Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon.

Authors:  Jim F Huggett; Tanya Novak; Jeremy A Garson; Clare Green; Stephen D Morris-Jones; Robert F Miller; Alimuddin Zumla
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2008-08-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.