Literature DB >> 18281922

Pharmacogenetic testing of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 alleles for warfarin.

David A Flockhart1, Dennis O'Kane, Marc S Williams, Michael S Watson, David A Flockhart1, Brian Gage, Roy Gandolfi, Richard King, Elaine Lyon, Robert Nussbaum, Dennis O'Kane, Kevin Schulman, David Veenstra, Marc S Williams, Michael S Watson.   

Abstract

American College of Medical Genetics statements and guidelines are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other health care professionals to help them provide quality medical genetic services. Adherence to these standards and guidelines does not necessarily ensure a successful medical outcome. These statements and guidelines should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the health care professional should apply his or her own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. It may be prudent, however, to document in the patient's record the rationale for any significant deviation from these standards and guidelines. Warfarin (Coumadin) is a potent drug that when used judiciously and monitored closely, leads to substantial reductions in morbidity and mortality from thromboembolic events. However, even with careful monitoring, initiation of warfarin dosing is associated with highly variable responses between individuals and challenges achieving and maintaining levels within the narrow therapeutic range that can lead to adverse drug events. Variants of two genes, CYP2C9 and VKORC1, account for 30-50% of the variability in dosing of warfarin; thus, many believe that testing of these genes will aid in warfarin dosing recommendations. Evidence about this test is evolving rapidly, as is its translation into clinical practice. In an effort to address this situation, a multidisciplinary expert group was organized in November 2006 to evaluate the role of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 testing in altering warfarin-related therapeutic goals and reduction of adverse drug events. A recently completed Rapid-ACCE (Analytical, Clinical Validity, Clinical Utility, and Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications) Review, commissioned to inform this work group, was the foundation for this analysis. From this effort, specific recommendations for the appropriate use of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 testing were developed and are presented here. The group determined that the analytical validity of these tests has been met, and there is strong evidence to support association between these genetic variants and therapeutic dose of warfarin. However, there is insufficient evidence, at this time, to recommend for or against routine CYP2C9 and VKORC1 testing in warfarin-naive patients. Prospective clinical trials are needed that provide direct evidence of the benefits, disadvantages, and costs associated with this testing in the setting of initial warfarin dosing. Although the routine use of warfarin genotyping is not endorsed by this work group at this time, in certain situations, CYP2C9 and VKORC1 testing may be useful, and warranted, in determining the cause of unusual therapeutic responses to warfarin therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18281922     DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318163c35f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  72 in total

1.  Integration of genetic, clinical, and INR data to refine warfarin dosing.

Authors:  P Lenzini; M Wadelius; S Kimmel; J L Anderson; A L Jorgensen; M Pirmohamed; M D Caldwell; N Limdi; J K Burmester; M B Dowd; P Angchaisuksiri; A R Bass; J Chen; N Eriksson; A Rane; J D Lindh; J F Carlquist; B D Horne; G Grice; P E Milligan; C Eby; J Shin; H Kim; D Kurnik; C M Stein; G McMillin; R C Pendleton; R L Berg; P Deloukas; B F Gage
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Clinician adoption of genetic testing for drug metabolizing enzymes: is patient safety the low-hanging fruit of personalized medicine?

Authors:  Harry Enchin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

Review 3.  Implications of pharmacogenetic testing for patients taking warfarin or clopidogrel.

Authors:  Megan M Donohue; David L Tirschwell
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  Personalized vascular medicine: individualizing drug therapy.

Authors:  Emil M Degoma; Giovanni Rivera; Scott M Lilly; M Haris U Usman; Emile R Mohler
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.239

5.  Pharmacogenetic testing: Current Evidence of Clinical Utility.

Authors:  Jivan Moaddeb; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2013-08-01

6.  Testing of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 alleles to guide warfarin dosing. Test category: pharmacogenomic (treatment).

Authors:  Daurice Grossniklaus
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2010-09-14

7.  Relative contribution of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes and early INR response to the prediction of warfarin sensitivity during initiation of therapy.

Authors:  Chun Li; Ute I Schwarz; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dan M Roden; C Michael Stein; Daniel Kurnik
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Understanding the pharmacogenetic approach to warfarin dosing.

Authors:  Ingrid Glurich; James K Burmester; Michael D Caldwell
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 9.  Warfarin sensitivity genotyping: a review of the literature and summary of patient experience.

Authors:  Thomas P Moyer; Dennis J O'Kane; Linnea M Baudhuin; Carmen L Wiley; Alexandre Fortini; Pamela K Fisher; Denise M Dupras; Rajeev Chaudhry; Prabin Thapa; Alan R Zinsmeister; John A Heit
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Personalized medicine and genomics: challenges and opportunities in assessing effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and future research priorities.

Authors:  Rena Conti; David L Veenstra; Katrina Armstrong; Lawrence J Lesko; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.