Literature DB >> 18281089

Alignment of corneal and lens epithelial cells by co-operative effects of substratum topography and DC electric fields.

Ann M Rajnicek1, Louise E Foubister, Colin D McCaig.   

Abstract

Corneal and lens epithelial cells (CECs and LECs) in the eye encounter precisely ordered fibre arrays on the nanoscale in tandem with an endogenous electric field (EF). Prosthetic biomaterials often incorporate topographical features intended to mimic those in situ. However, the cellular basis for control of cell morphology by nanotopography or by an EF is not clear. We examined cell axis alignment in response to substratum nanotopography and a physiological EF separately and in combination. Bovine CECs aligned parallel to substratum nanogrooves (NGs) as shallow as 14 nm but LECs were less sensitive. Actin filaments of both cell types concentrated at substratum ridges so we tested the mechanistic roles of rho, rac and cdc42, molecules that control cytoskeletal organization. CEC alignment to 130 nm deep NGs was prevented by the inhibition of rho, but not by the inhibition of cdc42, rac, or the rho effectors myosin light chain kinase or rho kinase. Conversely, CEC alignment was enhanced by the activation of rho. CECs on planar quartz substrata aligned orthogonal to an EF of 150 mV/mm. Alignment required signalling by cdc42 and rho but not rac, and was accompanied by lamellipodial reorganisation and cell migration toward the cathode. When CECs on vertically oriented NGs were exposed simultaneously to a horizontal EF, they aligned more robustly than to either cue alone and the enhanced alignment required rho signalling. Therefore, nanoscale substratum features and EFs co-operate to control cell axis alignment via rho, and cdc42-mediated intracellular signals, which can be exploited in tissue engineering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18281089     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  24 in total

Review 1.  A review of the responses of two- and three-dimensional engineered tissues to electric fields.

Authors:  Marie Hronik-Tupaj; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Automated and adaptable quantification of cellular alignment from microscopic images for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Turker Beyazoglu; Evan Hefner; Umut Atakan Gurkan; Utkan Demirci
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  A role for L-alpha-lysophosphatidylinositol and GPR55 in the modulation of migration, orientation and polarization of human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Lesley A Ford; Anke J Roelofs; Sharon Anavi-Goffer; Luisa Mowat; Daniel G Simpson; Andrew J Irving; Michael J Rogers; Ann M Rajnicek; Ruth A Ross
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Biomimetic stochastic topography and electric fields synergistically enhance directional migration of corneal epithelial cells in a MMP-3-dependent manner.

Authors:  Jing Gao; Vijay Krishna Raghunathan; Brian Reid; Dongguang Wei; Rodney C Diaz; Paul Russell; Christopher J Murphy; Min Zhao
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 5.  3D Microfabricated Scaffolds and Microfluidic Devices for Ocular Surface Replacement: a Review.

Authors:  Elisabetta Prina; Pritesh Mistry; Laura E Sidney; Jing Yang; Ricky D Wildman; Marina Bertolin; Claudia Breda; Barbara Ferrari; Vanessa Barbaro; Andrew Hopkinson; Harminder S Dua; Stefano Ferrari; Felicity R A J Rose
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.739

6.  Human corneal limbal epithelial cell response to varying silk film geometric topography in vitro.

Authors:  Brian D Lawrence; Zhi Pan; Aihong Liu; David L Kaplan; Mark I Rosenblatt
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 7.  Topographical control of ocular cell types for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Kevin J McHugh; Magali Saint-Geniez; Sarah L Tao
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.368

8.  Myosin phosphorylation on stress fibers predicts contact guidance behavior across diverse breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Ian C Schneider
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  The influence of biomimetic topographical features and the extracellular matrix peptide RGD on human corneal epithelial contact guidance.

Authors:  E J Tocce; S J Liliensiek; A H Broderick; Y Jiang; K C Murphy; C J Murphy; D M Lynn; P F Nealey
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 10.  Cell culture on MEMS platforms: a review.

Authors:  Ming Ni; Wen Hao Tong; Deepak Choudhury; Nur Aida Abdul Rahim; Ciprian Iliescu; Hanry Yu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.