Literature DB >> 18280377

Hemodynamic changes during the surgical removal of lower third molars.

Aurelia Alemany-Martínez1, Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón, Leonardo Berini-Aytés, Cosme Gay-Escoda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the hemodynamic changes in healthy patients during the surgical removal of lower third molars, and to evaluate whether these variations are attributable to patient anxiety and pain experienced during the surgical procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was made of 80 normotensive individuals (40 females and 40 males, mean age, 27 years [range, 18 to 67 years]) seen in the Service of Oral Surgery in the context of the Master's Degree Program in Oral Surgery and Implantology, School of Dentistry, University of Barcelona, for surgical extraction of the lower third molars. Local anesthesia comprised 4% articaine with vasoconstrictor (adrenalin 1:100.000). The following parameters were monitored in each of the surgical interventions: systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SaO(2)). Finally, tests of patient anxiety (Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale and Kleinknecht's Dental Fear Scale) were carried out, and the degree of pain experienced during the surgical procedure was assessed by means of a visual analog scale.
RESULTS: The females showed higher levels of anxiety. The most anxious patients had the lowest BP values and the highest HR, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. The variations in BP and HR during surgical extraction of the molars were within normal limits. In the case of BP, no significant changes were recorded; the highest mean SBP and DBP values were observed at the time of ostectomy and/or tooth sectioning. The lowest HR values were recorded at baseline, before the start of the surgical procedure, whereas the highest values were obtained during incision and flap raising. The SaO(2) values showed no significant changes and were lower at the start of the surgical procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the cardiovascular changes induced by the surgical extraction of molars were within normal ranges, considering the anxiety and stress induced by surgery. We consider it essential to avoid pain and minimize patient anxiety to ensure safe clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18280377     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  18 in total

1.  Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth.

Authors:  Nilesh V Rathi; Anushree A Khatri; Akshat G Agrawal; Sudhindra Baliga M; Nilima R Thosar; Shravani G Deolia
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

2.  Maxillary posterior teeth removal without palatal injection -truth or myth: a dilemma for oral surgeons.

Authors:  Kopal Sharma; Amit Sharma; Ml Aseri; Angelika Batta; Vikas Singh; Dinesh Pilania; Yogesh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-11-20

3.  Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study.

Authors:  Deepashri H Kambalimath; R S Dolas; H V Kambalimath; S M Agrawal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-04-05

4.  Glucose levels and hemodynamic changes in patients submitted to routine dental treatment with and without local anesthesia.

Authors:  Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi; Rafael Manfro; Anderson Nardi
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Bupivacaine 0.5% versus articaine 4% for the removal of lower third molars. A crossover randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Manuel Sancho-Puchades; Miguel-Ángel Vílchez-Pérez; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón; Jordi Paredes-García; Leonardo Berini-Aytés; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-05-01

6.  Comparative split-mouth study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar extraction.

Authors:  Hilario Pellicer-Chover; Juan Cervera-Ballester; José M Sanchis-Bielsa; María A Peñarrocha-Diago; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; Berta García-Mira
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2013-04-01

7.  Extraction bradycardia: a pilot case-crossover study.

Authors:  Ashkan Rashad; Ralf Smeets; Madiha Rana; Behnam Bohluli
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Hemodynamic changes and pain perception-related anxiety after experiencing an impacted-tooth removal: clinical practice outcome.

Authors:  Somchart Raocharernporn; Kiatanant Boonsiriseth; Manop Khanijou; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2017-06-29

9.  Comparing hemodynamic and glycemic response to local anesthesia with epinephrine and without epinephrine in patients undergoing tooth extractions.

Authors:  Paramjot Kaur; Rashi Bahl; Sameer Kaura; Sumit Bansal
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

10.  Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Bahadir Ezmek; Ahmet Arslan; Cagri Delilbasi; Kemal Sencift
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.