Literature DB >> 18279927

Preoperative prediction of unifocal, unilateral, margin-negative, and small volume prostate cancer.

Kenneth A Iczkowski1, Deloar Hossain, Kathleen C Torkko, Junqi Qian, M Scott Lucia, Thomas M Wheeler, John C Rewcastle, David G Bostwick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Contemporary prostate carcinoma is frequently of small volume and early stage. Subtotal gland ablation by minimally invasive therapies such as cryotherapy demands preoperative prediction of unifocal, unilateral, margin-negative, and small volume (less than 0.5 mL) cancer.
METHODS: We examined matched biopsy and prostatectomy and clinical data from 393 patients at two institutions who underwent surgery in 2000 through 2003. Radical prostatectomy specimens were uniformly sectioned at 5-mm intervals and completely embedded. Numerous clinical and biopsy variables were correlated by regression analysis with unifocal, unilateral, margin-negative, and 0.5 mL or less volume cancer in the prostatectomy specimen. Odds ratios (OR) were determined.
RESULTS: At prostatectomy, 92 (23%) had unifocal cancer, 90 (23%) had unilateral cancer, 348 (89%) had organ-confined cancer, and 106 (31%) had small volume cancer. Unilateral cancer occurred in 71% to 76% of cases of unilateral cancer in the biopsy (OR, 4.30; if 9 or more cores were sampled, OR rose to 6.83), and was predicted by unifocality in the biopsy (OR, 2.63). Unifocal cancer was predicted by unilateral (OR, 2.66) but not unifocal, cancer present in the biopsy. Negative surgical margins were predicted by unilateral (OR, 2.53; positive predictive value, 82%) cancer in the biopsy and by serum prostate specific antigen (OR, 5.33). Small volume cancer was predicted by unilateral (OR, 5.50) and unifocal (OR, 7.98) cancer in the biopsy; Gleason score greater than 7 predicted a non-small volume cancer (OR, 7.52).
CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral or unifocal cancer on biopsy are among the strongest predictors of unilateral, unifocal, and small volume prostate cancer in contemporary practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18279927     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

1.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer -choosing the middle ground.

Authors:  Uri Lindner; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Evolution of the clinical presentation of men undergoing radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Ashley E Ross; Misop Han; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Recent advances in imaging-guided interventions for prostate cancers.

Authors:  Xia Wu; Feng Zhang; Ran Chen; Weiliang Zheng; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 4.  Current perspectives on Gleason grading of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; M Scott Lucia
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Focal therapy in prostate cancer: modalities, findings and future considerations.

Authors:  Uri Lindner; John Trachtenberg; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Pathologic basis of focal therapy for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir Mouraviev; Janice M Mayes; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Update on cryotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chad R Ritch; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Current prostate biopsy protocols cannot reliably identify patients for focal therapy: correlation of low-risk prostate cancer on biopsy with radical prostatectomy findings.

Authors:  Philip Quann; David F Jarrard; Wei Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2010-03-30

Review 9.  Tumor focality in prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy.

Authors:  Markos Karavitakis; Hashim U Ahmed; Paul D Abel; Steven Hazell; Mathias H Winkler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Frequency of positive surgical margin at prostatectomy and its effect on patient outcome.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; M Scott Lucia
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.