Eric M Pauli1, Matthew T Moyer, Randy S Haluck, Abraham Mathew. 1. Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ability to access the abdominal cavity though a direct (modified-PEG type) gastric incision to perform natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has been demonstrated in the literature. However, the optimal technique to access the abdomen remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a transgastric approach to the abdominal cavity through an extended submucosal tunnel. DESIGN: Animal feasibility study. INTERVENTIONS: Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy was performed in 7 anesthetized swine, including 2 acute and 5 survival animals. After the creation of a 10-cm to 12-cm tunnel in the gastric submucosal plane, the peritoneal cavity was accessed by needle-knife puncture through the gastric wall near the greater curvature. The peritoneal cavity was examined before the gastric mucosal incision was closed with endoclips. Survival animals were euthanized two weeks after the procedure, and a necropsy was performed. RESULTS: The abdominal cavity was successfully entered without complication in all 7 animals. The mucosal incisions were able to be closed by endoscopy. In the survival experiments, all animals recovered and gained weight. Two animals experienced clinically unapparent infectious complications. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: A peroral transgastric approach to the abdominal cavity through an extended submucosal tunnel is technically feasible and allows safe abdominal access and reliable closure with currently available technology. It has potential benefits as an alternative to direct transgastric access for NOTES procedures.
BACKGROUND: The ability to access the abdominal cavity though a direct (modified-PEG type) gastric incision to perform natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has been demonstrated in the literature. However, the optimal technique to access the abdomen remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a transgastric approach to the abdominal cavity through an extended submucosal tunnel. DESIGN: Animal feasibility study. INTERVENTIONS: Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy was performed in 7 anesthetized swine, including 2 acute and 5 survival animals. After the creation of a 10-cm to 12-cm tunnel in the gastric submucosal plane, the peritoneal cavity was accessed by needle-knife puncture through the gastric wall near the greater curvature. The peritoneal cavity was examined before the gastric mucosal incision was closed with endoclips. Survival animals were euthanized two weeks after the procedure, and a necropsy was performed. RESULTS: The abdominal cavity was successfully entered without complication in all 7 animals. The mucosal incisions were able to be closed by endoscopy. In the survival experiments, all animals recovered and gained weight. Two animals experienced clinically unapparent infectious complications. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: A peroral transgastric approach to the abdominal cavity through an extended submucosal tunnel is technically feasible and allows safe abdominal access and reliable closure with currently available technology. It has potential benefits as an alternative to direct transgastric access for NOTES procedures.
Authors: Josiel P Vieira; Marcelo M Linhares; Elesiário M Caetano; Rita M A Moura; Vitor Asseituno; Rogério Fuzyi; Manoel J B Girão; José M Ruano; Alberto Goldenberg; Gaspar de Jesus L Filho; Délcio Matos Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-06-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Peter Nau; E Christopher Ellison; Peter Muscarella; Dean Mikami; Vimal K Narula; Bradley Needleman; W Scott Melvin; Jeffrey W Hazey Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Eric M Pauli; Abraham Mathew; Randy S Haluck; Adrian M Ionescu; Matthew T Moyer; Timothy R Shope; Ann M Rogers Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-07-12 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Eric Mark Pauli; Randy S Haluck; Adrian M Ionescu; Ann M Rogers; Timothy R Shope; Matthew T Moyer; Arnab Biswas; Abraham Mathew Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Edward D Auyang; Byron F Santos; Daniel H Enter; Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-05-07 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Abraham Mathew; Jonathan M Tomasko; Eric M Pauli; Matthew T Moyer; Jegan Gopal; Brooke B Ancrile; Ann M Rogers; Randy S Haluck Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 4.584