Literature DB >> 18279325

Concurrent action observation modulates practice-induced motor memory formation.

K Stefan1, J Classen, P Celnik, L G Cohen.   

Abstract

Motor practice is associated with the formation of elementary motor memories. Here we tested in human subjects the hypothesis that observation of a motor training associated with physical practice will modulate the encoding process of a motor memory relative to physical practice alone. Voluntary thumb motions were practiced (i) alone in a direction opposite to the baseline direction of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked movements (physical practice, PP) and in combination with observation of synchronous movements that were either (ii) directionally congruent (same direction, PP + AOc) or (iii) non-congruent (opposite direction, PP + AOnc) to the practiced ones. We evaluated the following measures of motor memory formation: percentage of TMS-evoked thumb movements falling in the direction of practiced motions, acceleration of TMS-evoked movements along the principal movement axis and corticomuscular excitability of training muscles as indexed by motor-evoked potential amplitudes. Both PP and PP + AOc, but not PP + AOnc, significantly increased the percentage of TMS-evoked movements falling in the practiced direction, changed the compound acceleration vector into the trained direction and enhanced the motor-evoked potential amplitudes in the training agonist muscle. The percentage of TMS-evoked movements falling in the practiced direction increased significantly more after PP + AOc than after PP. Across all measures of motor memory formation, PP + AOc was most efficacious, followed by PP and PP + AOnc. Action observation modulates practice effects on formation of a motor memory. Strengthening of the process of motor memory encoding depends on the directional congruency of the observed model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18279325     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06035.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  46 in total

1.  Observation learning versus physical practice leads to different consolidation outcomes in a movement timing task.

Authors:  Maxime Trempe; Maxime Sabourin; Hassan Rohbanfard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of trial order and error magnitude on motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; Elizabeth T Wilson; Sukhvinder S Obhi; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance.

Authors:  Giacomo Rizzolatti; Maddalena Fabbri-Destro; Luigi Cattaneo
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Neurol       Date:  2009-01

5.  The effect of test TMS intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition in different excitability states.

Authors:  M I Garry; R H S Thomson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor excitability during imagination and observation of foot dorsiflexions.

Authors:  Joachim Liepert; Nina Neveling
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  Mirror neurons: from discovery to autism.

Authors:  Giacomo Rizzolatti; Maddalena Fabbri-Destro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Increased use-dependent plasticity in chronic insomnia.

Authors:  Rachel E Salas; Joseph M Galea; Alyssa A Gamaldo; Charlene E Gamaldo; Richard P Allen; Michael T Smith; Gabriela Cantarero; Barbara D Lam; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  Crossmodal encoding of motor sequence memories.

Authors:  Marianne A Stephan; Brittany Heckel; Sunbin Song; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-04-27

Review 10.  Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jennifer L Collinger; Monica A Perez; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Steven W Brose; Andrew B Schwartz; Michael L Boninger; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.784

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.