Leon A Simons1, Michael Ortiz, Gordon Calcino. 1. Lipid Research Department, University of New South Wales, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. l.simons@unsw.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study persistence and adherence with the use of common antihypertensive (AHT) medications. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal assessment of Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme claim records covering the period January 2004 to December 2006. We analysed a 10% random sample of all Australian long-term health concession card holders who had been commenced on an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (A2RA), an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and/or a calcium channel blocker (CCB), but for whom no AHT medication had been dispensed in the previous 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients failing to fill a second prescription; median persistence time with medication (ie, non-cessation of therapy); persistence with medication over 33 months; median medication possession ratio (MPR, defined as the proportion of prescribed medication actually consumed by patients persisting with treatment). RESULTS: The database yielded information relating to 48 690 patients prescribed AHT medication. Nineteen per cent of patients failed to collect a second prescription. The median persistence time was 20 months. The data were little different from the population average with respect to A2RAs or ACEIs, but persistence was 57% poorer with respect to CCBs (log-rank P < 0.001) (28% of patients prescribed CCBs failed to collect a second prescription; median persistence time, 7 months). There were differences in persistence between individual drugs in the respective classes, the best outcomes being with candesartan and telmisartan (A2RAs; 10%-20% better), perindopril (ACEI; 25% better) and lercanidipine (CCB; 25% better). Median MPRs were generally around 100%, indicating that most patients who collected prescriptions also showed good adherence to treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: There is an ongoing problem of poor persistence with commonly used AHT medications. This may represent a diminished opportunity for cardiovascular disease prevention.
OBJECTIVE: To study persistence and adherence with the use of common antihypertensive (AHT) medications. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal assessment of Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme claim records covering the period January 2004 to December 2006. We analysed a 10% random sample of all Australian long-term health concession card holders who had been commenced on an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (A2RA), an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and/or a calcium channel blocker (CCB), but for whom no AHT medication had been dispensed in the previous 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients failing to fill a second prescription; median persistence time with medication (ie, non-cessation of therapy); persistence with medication over 33 months; median medication possession ratio (MPR, defined as the proportion of prescribed medication actually consumed by patients persisting with treatment). RESULTS: The database yielded information relating to 48 690 patients prescribed AHT medication. Nineteen per cent of patients failed to collect a second prescription. The median persistence time was 20 months. The data were little different from the population average with respect to A2RAs or ACEIs, but persistence was 57% poorer with respect to CCBs (log-rank P < 0.001) (28% of patients prescribed CCBs failed to collect a second prescription; median persistence time, 7 months). There were differences in persistence between individual drugs in the respective classes, the best outcomes being with candesartan and telmisartan (A2RAs; 10%-20% better), perindopril (ACEI; 25% better) and lercanidipine (CCB; 25% better). Median MPRs were generally around 100%, indicating that most patients who collected prescriptions also showed good adherence to treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: There is an ongoing problem of poor persistence with commonly used AHT medications. This may represent a diminished opportunity for cardiovascular disease prevention.
Authors: Benjamin J Powers; Remy R Coeytaux; Rowena J Dolor; Vic Hasselblad; Uptal D Patel; William S Yancy; Rebecca N Gray; R Julian Irvine; Amy S Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Seyed Hamidreza Mahmoudpour; Folkert W Asselbergs; Patrick C Souverein; Anthonius de Boer; Anke H Maitland-van der Zee Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Miriam Qvarnström; Thomas Kahan; Helle Kieler; Lena Brandt; Jan Hasselström; Kristina Bengtsson Boström; Karin Manhem; Per Hjerpe; Björn Wettermark Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Rosalind Lau; Kay Stewart; Kevin P McNamara; Shane L Jackson; Jeffery D Hughes; Gregory M Peterson; Diana A Bortoletto; Jenny McDowell; Michael J Bailey; Arthur Hsueh; Johnson George Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-02-05 Impact factor: 2.655