Svetla Gadzhanova1, Elizabeth E Roughead1, Louise E Bartlett2,3. 1. Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Sansom Institute, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. 2. Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Sansom Institute, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. louise@bartlet.com.au. 3. Department of Health, Commonwealth Government of Australia, Canberra, Australia. louise@bartlet.com.au.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of initial antihypertensive therapy including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) on long-term persistence to therapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using prescription claims data from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS). Kaplan-Meier analysis of prescription refills and cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the time on therapy (persistence) in people newly initiated to monotherapy or combination therapy including ACE or ARB, between April 2007 and March 2008. Differences in persistence to initial drug class or any antihypertensive therapy were reported at 4-year follow-up. RESULTS: About 119,500 persons initiated ACE or ARB: 47 % initiated ACE monotherapy; 32 % ARB monotherapy; 13 % ACE combinations; and 8 % ARB combinations. Persistence (% on treatment at 4 years) to index therapy was lower in people starting ACE and ARB combinations compared to ACE or ARB monotherapies: ACE combination (12 %) versus ACE monotherapy (25 %) and ARB combinations (22 %) versus ARB monotherapy (35 %). Persistence was higher in those initiating fixed dose combinations (FDC) versus separate pill combinations of ACEs (19 vs. 10 %) and ARBs (25 vs. 14 %). Persistence at 4 years to any antihypertensive therapy was similar between initiators to ACE or ARB monotherapy (60 and 61 %, p = 0.08), ACE or ARB combinations (56 %, p = 0.99), and was slightly higher for separate pill combinations (57-59 %) versus FDC (55 %). CONCLUSION: Choice of initial antihypertensive may have little impact on long-term persistence to therapy.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of initial antihypertensive therapy including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) on long-term persistence to therapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using prescription claims data from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS). Kaplan-Meier analysis of prescription refills and cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the time on therapy (persistence) in people newly initiated to monotherapy or combination therapy including ACE or ARB, between April 2007 and March 2008. Differences in persistence to initial drug class or any antihypertensive therapy were reported at 4-year follow-up. RESULTS: About 119,500 persons initiated ACE or ARB: 47 % initiated ACE monotherapy; 32 % ARB monotherapy; 13 % ACE combinations; and 8 % ARB combinations. Persistence (% on treatment at 4 years) to index therapy was lower in people starting ACE and ARB combinations compared to ACE or ARB monotherapies: ACE combination (12 %) versus ACE monotherapy (25 %) and ARB combinations (22 %) versus ARB monotherapy (35 %). Persistence was higher in those initiating fixed dose combinations (FDC) versus separate pill combinations of ACEs (19 vs. 10 %) and ARBs (25 vs. 14 %). Persistence at 4 years to any antihypertensive therapy was similar between initiators to ACE or ARB monotherapy (60 and 61 %, p = 0.08), ACE or ARB combinations (56 %, p = 0.99), and was slightly higher for separate pill combinations (57-59 %) versus FDC (55 %). CONCLUSION: Choice of initial antihypertensive may have little impact on long-term persistence to therapy.
Authors: E Degli Esposti; A Sturani; M Di Martino; P Falasca; M V Novi; G Baio; S Buda; M Volpe Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redon; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stéphane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad; Josep Redon; Anna Dominiczak; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Peter M Nilsson; Michel Burnier; Margus Viigimaa; Ettore Ambrosioni; Mark Caufield; Antonio Coca; Michael Hecht Olsen; Roland E Schmieder; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Thierry C Gillebert; Michal Tendera; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Stefan D Anker; Johann Bauersachs; Jana Brguljan Hitij; Mark Caulfield; Marc De Buyzere; Sabina De Geest; Geneviève Anne Derumeaux; Serap Erdine; Csaba Farsang; Christian Funck-Brentano; Vjekoslav Gerc; Giuseppe Germano; Stephan Gielen; Herman Haller; Arno W Hoes; Jens Jordan; Thomas Kahan; Michel Komajda; Dragan Lovic; Heiko Mahrholdt; Michael Hecht Olsen; Jan Ostergren; Gianfranco Parati; Joep Perk; Jorge Polonia; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Lars Rydén; Yuriy Sirenko; Alice Stanton; Harry Struijker-Boudier; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Massimo Volpe; David A Wood Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Isabelle Arnet; Melanie Greenland; Matthew W Knuiman; Jamie M Rankin; Joe Hung; Lee Nedkoff; Tom G Briffa; Frank M Sanfilippo Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 4.790